Kamal Pralhad Kumbhar vs Ravindra Namdeo Kumbhar Advocate - kumbhar S.K. — 28/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Partition,Possession. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN070002312018
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
49/2018
Filing Date
20-03-2018
Registration No
28/2018
Registration Date
21-03-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,kmahankal
Judge
4-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Kavathe-Mahankal
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kamal Pralhad Kumbhar
Adv. Mujawar Babalal Badhasha
Respondent(s)
Ravindra Namdeo Kumbhar Advocate - kumbhar S.K.
Lalita Rajkumar Kumbhar
Ratnakant Rajkumar Kumbhar
Rushikesh Rajkumar Kumbhar
Jayshree Rajkumar Kumbhar
Joyti Shankar Kumbhar
Poonam Ajit Kumbhar
Adv. Chavan Sachin Krishna
Priyanka Nagesh Pawar
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Kavathe-Mahankal
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 29-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 07-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 08-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The defendant's application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(b) & (c) of the CPC on grounds of under-valuation of relief and improper court fees was rejected. The court found that the plaintiff had properly valued the suit property (agricultural land and house) according to the Sub-Registrar's valuation certificate and the Maharashtra Court Fees Act, and had paid the requisite court fees of Rs. 12,635/- accordingly. No order as to costs was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The defendant's application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(b) & (c) of the CPC on grounds of under-valuation of relief and improper court fees was rejected. The court found that the plaintiff had properly valued the suit property (agricultural land and house) according to the Sub-Registrar's valuation certificate and the Maharashtra Court Fees Act, and had paid the requisite court fees of Rs. 12,635/- accordingly. No order as to costs was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts