Ashitosh Alis Akshay Balasaheb Dabade vs State Of Maharashtra Through Kavathemahankal Police Station — 13/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 11th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSN070001612026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
136/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
13/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,kmahankal
Judge
3-Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. KAVATHEMAHANKAL
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashitosh Alis Akshay Balasaheb Dabade
Adv. Hiremath Shrikant Mallikarjun
Respondent(s)
State Of Maharashtra Through Kavathemahankal Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. KAVATHEMAHANKAL
Disposed
Arguments
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Notice_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 28-02-2026 | Notice_Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court granted the applicant Ashitosh Dubde's petition for interim custody of his seized Maruti Suzuki XL6 vehicle (registration MH-43-BY-6599) under CrPC Section 451, finding that he is the lawful owner as verified through vehicle documents and that the vehicle's deterioration in police custody posed financial hardship. The court imposed conditions including a ₹10 lakh indemnity bond, prohibition on vehicle transfer or use in any crime, mandatory return upon court orders, insurance coverage within 7 days, and vehicle photography documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court granted the applicant Ashitosh Dubde's petition for interim custody of his seized Maruti Suzuki XL6 vehicle (registration MH-43-BY-6599) under CrPC Section 451, finding that he is the lawful owner as verified through vehicle documents and that the vehicle's deterioration in police custody posed financial hardship. The court imposed conditions including a ₹10 lakh indemnity bond, prohibition on vehicle transfer or use in any crime, mandatory return upon court orders, insurance coverage within 7 days, and vehicle photography documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts