Sunita Babaso Jadhav vs Babaso Sitaram Jadhav — 14/2024
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 206. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
PWDVA Execution - Execution of order passed under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHSN060029752024
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
06-12-2024
Filing Number
2416/2024
Filing Date
12-12-2024
Registration No
14/2024
Registration Date
16-12-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Miraj
Judge
2-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. MIRAJ, J.M.F.C. MIRAJ
FIR Details
Police Station
Miraj City Police Station
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sunita Babaso Jadhav
Adv. Nandre Sunil Jinappa
Respondent(s)
Babaso Sitaram Jadhav
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. MIRAJ, J.M.F.C. MIRAJ
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Ex-Parte Order
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 21-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 12-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 30-01-2026 | Ex-Parte Order |
Interim Orders
Summary: In PWDV Execution No. 14/2024, the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Miraj, found that notice was not duly served on the respondent. Consequently, the matter has been adjourned and kept for argument on a future date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In PWDV Execution No. 14/2024, the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Miraj, found that notice was not duly served on the respondent. Consequently, the matter has been adjourned and kept for argument on a future date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts