Suman Rajendra Jadhav vs No Body — 69/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHSN060028592025
e-Filing Number
20-08-2025
Filing Number
422/2025
Filing Date
21-Aug-2025
Registration No
69/2025
Registration Date
21-Aug-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Miraj
Judge
2-Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Suman Rajendra Jadhav
Adv. Alase Shabbir Mohammad Imam
Respondent(s)
-
1.No Body
Case History
-
28-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Arguments
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
10-Feb-2026
Arguments
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
30-Jan-2026
Arguments
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
23-Jan-2026
Arguments
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
06-Jan-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
In Civil M.A. No. 69/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Miraj, the court ordered that the applicant must argue on the point of court fees as property has been mentioned in the application. The case has been adjourned for further arguments on the court fee issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Jan-2026
Arguments
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
16-Dec-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
16-Dec-2025
Arguments
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
05-Dec-2025
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
03-Nov-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
03-Nov-2025
Compliance
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
03-Oct-2025
Public Notice/Proclamation
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
25-Aug-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
25-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 69/2025
In Civil M.A. No. 69/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Miraj, the court ordered that the applicant must argue on the point of court fees as property has been mentioned in the application. The case has been adjourned for further arguments on the court fee issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts