Sanjay Rangrao Mane vs Mahaveer Bharamu Chougule — 199/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN060025552025
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
31-07-2025
Filing Number
399/2025
Filing Date
02-08-2025
Registration No
199/2025
Registration Date
02-08-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Miraj
Judge
2-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. MIRAJ, J.M.F.C. MIRAJ
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sanjay Rangrao Mane
Adv. Pawar Umesh Bhaskar
Balaso Rangrao Mane
Adv. Pawar Umesh Bhaskar
Khandu Rangrao Mane
Adv. Pawar Umesh Bhaskar
Malan Shivaji Mane
Adv. PAWAR UMESH BHASKAR
Janabai Rangrao Mane
Adv. PAWAR UMESH BHASKAR
Prabhakar Subrao Mane
Adv. PAWAR UMESH BHASKAR
Rajaram Alias Rajkumar Subrao Mane
Adv. PAWAR UMESH BHASKAR
Indubai Subrao Mane
Adv. PAWAR UMESH BHASKAR
Balaso Subrao Mane
Adv. Pawar Umesh Bhaskar
Aakkatai Balaso Mane
Adv. PAWAR UMESH BHASKAR
Respondent(s)
Mahaveer Bharamu Chougule
Anita Anil Gundwade
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. MIRAJ, J.M.F.C. MIRAJ
Reply/Say
Argument on Exh.____Unready
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 12-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 21-11-2025 | W.S. and Say | |
| 16-10-2025 | W.S. and Say | |
| 19-09-2025 | W.S. and Say |
Interim Orders
Summary: In RCS No. 199/2025, the Joint Civil Judge at Miraj rejected Defendants 1 & 2's application for filing a written statement (W.S.) due to their failure to file it within the prescribed time. The court ordered that the case shall proceed without the written statement of Defendants 1 and 2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In RCS No. 199/2025, the Joint Civil Judge at Miraj rejected Defendants 1 & 2's application for filing a written statement (W.S.) due to their failure to file it within the prescribed time. The court ordered that the case shall proceed without the written statement of Defendants 1 and 2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts