Mumtaj Ajij Inamdar vs Aapaso Babu Kalawant Advocate - Mane Nitin Krishnaji, Mane Nitin Krishnaji — 302/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 32,39,. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN060025302023
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
597/2023
Filing Date
12-10-2023
Registration No
302/2023
Registration Date
20-10-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Miraj
Judge
2-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. MIRAJ, J.M.F.C. MIRAJ
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mumtaj Ajij Inamdar
Adv. Mushrif Serab Abdulmunaf, Mushrif Serab Abdulmunaf, Mushrif Serab Abdulmunaf
Niyaj Ajij Inamdar
Aafrin Ajij Inamdar
Respondent(s)
Aapaso Babu Kalawant Advocate - Mane Nitin Krishnaji, Mane Nitin Krishnaji
Noor Mohammad Bapuso Kalavant
Mahiraj Bapuso Kalavant
Jannat Bapuso Kalavant
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. MIRAJ, J.M.F.C. MIRAJ
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 04-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 02-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 25-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
The plaintiffs' application for an injunction restraining the defendants from constructing a toilet on the disputed property has been rejected. The court found no prima facie case, no balance of convenience favoring the plaintiffs, and no irreparable loss, noting that restraining the defendants would deprive them of essential facilities during the ongoing partition suit. Costs are imposed in the main cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The plaintiffs' application for an injunction restraining the defendants from constructing a toilet on the disputed property has been rejected. The court found no prima facie case, no balance of convenience favoring the plaintiffs, and no irreparable loss, noting that restraining the defendants would deprive them of essential facilities during the ongoing partition suit. Costs are imposed in the main cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts