Sultana Jahangir Kutwade vs Gujratbi Nijam Kutwade Advocate - Udgave Vrushbh Satyppa — 2/2021
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 18,19,3,23. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHSN060018522021
Filing Number
1511/2021
Filing Date
24-Sep-2021
Registration No
2/2021
Registration Date
27-Sep-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Miraj
Judge
2-Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sultana Jahangir Kutwade
Adv. CHOUGULE SHASHIKANT BABASAHEB
-
2.Jiya Jahangir Kutwade
Adv. CHOUGULE SHASHIKANT BABASAHEB
-
3.Sumaiya Jahangir Kutwade
Adv. CHOUGULE SHASHIKANT BABASAHEB
Respondent(s)
-
1.Gujratbi Nijam Kutwade Advocate - Udgave Vrushbh Satyppa
-
2.Apsar Nijam Kutwade
-
3.Arshid Apsar Kutwade
-
4.Sahil Apsar Kutwade
-
5.Farida Mustakali Mulla
-
6.Vahida Aksar Dalwai
Case History
-
21-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
16-Jan-2026
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
18-Nov-2025
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
08-Sep-2025
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
30-Jul-2025
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
02-Jul-2025
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
09-Jun-2025
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
05-May-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj
-
08-Apr-2025
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
04-Mar-2025
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
03-Feb-2025
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
04-Jan-2025
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
10-Dec-2024
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
14-Nov-2024
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
04-Oct-2024
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
05-Sep-2024
Hearing
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
29-Jul-2024
Hearing
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
25-Jun-2024
Hearing
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
03-May-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj
-
04-Apr-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj
-
04-Mar-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj
-
06-Feb-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj
-
11-Jan-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The petition filed by Sultana vs. Gujaratbai and others was allowed. The court permitted the petitioner to file certified copies of two notarized documents (serial numbers 3 and 4) as exhibit marks with the court record, with the respondents' consent. The court ruled that the original notarized documents need not be produced as they are already part of the respondents' civil case filed against the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jan-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj
-
11-Dec-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj
-
07-Nov-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj
-
30-Oct-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj
-
11-Oct-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj
-
29-Sep-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj
-
13-Sep-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj
-
24-Aug-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj
-
02-Aug-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj
-
04-Jul-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj
-
30-Apr-2023
Hearing
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
06-Mar-2023
Hearing
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
07-Feb-2023
Hearing
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
12-Jan-2023
Hearing
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
19-Dec-2022
Hearing
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
15-Nov-2022
Awaiting Notice
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
17-Oct-2022
Steps_Unready
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
23-Sep-2022
Awaiting Notice
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
26-Aug-2022
Awaiting Notice
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
08-Aug-2022
Awaiting Notice
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
18-Jul-2022
Awaiting Notice
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
21-Jun-2022
Awaiting Notice
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
10-Jun-2022
Awaiting Notice
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
20-May-2022
Awaiting Notice
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
29-Apr-2022
Awaiting Notice
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
06-Apr-2022
Steps_Unready
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
07-Mar-2022
Steps_Unready
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
11-Feb-2022
Hearing
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
08-Feb-2022
Order on Exh
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
28-Jan-2022
Order on Exh
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
24-Jan-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
19-Jan-2022
Notice_Unready
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
15-Dec-2021
Notice_Unready
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
11-Dec-2021
Notice_Unready
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
26-Nov-2021
Notice_Unready
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
08-Nov-2021
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
29-Oct-2021
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
07-Oct-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Sep-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 2/2021
Summary: The petition filed by Sultana vs. Gujaratbai and others was allowed. The court permitted the petitioner to file certified copies of two notarized documents (serial numbers 3 and 4) as exhibit marks with the court record, with the respondents' consent. The court ruled that the original notarized documents need not be produced as they are already part of the respondents' civil case filed against the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts