Avinash Tatyaso Shinde vs Allappa alias Aalamprabhu Tamanna Vantamure Advocate - Shah Ashok Parshuram1. — 78/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9.4. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 07th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHSN060018202022
Filing Number
457/2022
Filing Date
03-09-2022
Registration No
78/2022
Registration Date
03-09-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Miraj
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C MIRAJ
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Avinash Tatyaso Shinde
Adv. Patil Balasaheb Vishwasrao
Respondent(s)
Allappa alias Aalamprabhu Tamanna Vantamure Advocate - Shah Ashok Parshuram1.
Shivanand Aalamprabhu ( Allappa ) Vantamure
Adv. Shah Ashok Parshuram1.
Nagendrakumar Aalamprabhu ( Allappa ) Vantamure
Adv. Shah Ashok Parshuram1.
Ajit Aalamprabhu ( Allappa ) Vantamure
Adv. Shah Ashok Parshuram1.
Amresh Aalamprabhu ( Allappa ) Vantamure
Adv. Shah Ashok Parshuram1.
Minakshi Shivkumar Kolhapure
Adv. Shah Ashok Parshuram
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C MIRAJ
Disposed
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-02-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 07-02-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 03-01-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 07-11-2025 | Dismissal Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Civil Judge of Miraj dismissed the application filed by Avinash Tatyso Shinde against Shivanand (Allamprabhu) Tammanna Vantmure for default and closed the proceedings. The court found that the applicant repeatedly remained absent during hearings despite the opponent being present and ready for cross-examination, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the matter which had lingered for over 3 years without progress. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Civil Judge of Miraj dismissed the application filed by Avinash Tatyso Shinde against Shivanand (Allamprabhu) Tammanna Vantmure for default and closed the proceedings. The court found that the applicant repeatedly remained absent during hearings despite the opponent being present and ready for cross-examination, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the matter which had lingered for over 3 years without progress. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts