Parshuram Babu Kabade vs Ratankumar Yallappa Kabade Advocate - Patil Bhaskar Nana — 196/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 07-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN060016832023

Filing Number

409/2023

Filing Date

11-Jul-2023

Registration No

196/2023

Registration Date

17-Jul-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Miraj

Judge

3-2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Parshuram Babu Kabade

    Adv. Killedar C.S

  2. 2.Bharti Parshuram Kabade

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ratankumar Yallappa Kabade Advocate - Patil Bhaskar Nana

  2. 2.Sadashiv Babu Kabade

  3. 3.Kasturi Yallappa Kabade

Case History

  1. 07-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj

  3. 19-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj

  4. 26-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj

  5. 02-May-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj

  6. 04-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj

  7. 28-Mar-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj

  8. 27-Feb-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj

  9. 09-Jan-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj

  10. 21-Nov-2024

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj

  11. 15-Oct-2024

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Summary The Civil Judge Junior Division at Miraj rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction against the defendants regarding disputed agricultural properties. Although the court found that the plaintiffs would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction were denied, it determined that the plaintiffs failed to establish prima facie possession of the suit properties and that the balance of convenience did not favor them, as the defendants are co-owners with rights in the disputed ancestral properties. Costs were awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 15-Oct-2024

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj

  13. 03-Oct-2024

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj

  14. 26-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj

  15. 19-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj

  16. 30-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj

  17. 02-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Miraj

  18. 02-May-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj

  19. 03-Apr-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj

  20. 11-Mar-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj

  21. 20-Feb-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj

  22. 22-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj

  23. 09-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj

  24. 12-Dec-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj

  25. 06-Nov-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj

  26. 07-Oct-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj

  27. 15-Sep-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj

  28. 25-Aug-2023

    Written Statement

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj

  29. 05-Aug-2023

    Written Statement

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj

  30. 19-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 11-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 196/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Civil Judge Junior Division at Miraj rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction against the defendants regarding disputed agricultural properties. Although the court found that the plaintiffs would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction were denied, it determined that the plaintiffs failed to establish prima facie possession of the suit properties and that the balance of convenience did not favor them, as the defendants are co-owners with rights in the disputed ancestral properties. Costs were awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case