Shreedarshan Shantinath Kavthekar vs Anita Sanjay Patil Advocate - Medsinge Nandkumar Pandurang — 173/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 6. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN060015372023

Awaiting Summons

Next Hearing

04th May 2026

Filing Number

372/2023

Filing Date

23-06-2023

Registration No

173/2023

Registration Date

01-07-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Miraj

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C MIRAJ

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 6

Petitioner(s)

Shreedarshan Shantinath Kavthekar

Adv. Udgave Vrushbh Satyppa

Shanthinath Anna Kavthekar

Mangal Shanthinath Kavthekar

Respondent(s)

Anita Sanjay Patil Advocate - Medsinge Nandkumar Pandurang

Vaijanta Dattatraya Patil

Adv. Medsinge Nandkumar Pandurang

Kashibai Kallappa Ghodhe

Adv. Medsinge Nandkumar Pandurang

Hausabai Bapu Gavde

Adv. Medsinge Nandkumar Pandurang

Vidya Prakash Deshinge

Hena Dhanraj Deshinge

Shalan Krushna Banne

Seema Raghu Kolekar

Dattatraya Pandurang Ghodhe

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C MIRAJ

07-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

13-01-2026

Awaiting Summons

07-11-2025

Awaiting Summons

24-09-2025

Awaiting Summons

16-07-2025

Awaiting Summons

Interim Orders

21-09-2024
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application and set aside the previous "without affidavit" order against defendants. The court found the defendants' reasons for delayed filing of affidavits and statements to be justified, considering the delay in light of principles of natural justice. The court ordered the defendants to pay Rs. 500 as costs to the plaintiff, while permitting the defendants to file their affidavits and statements in the case concerning a property possession dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application and set aside the previous "without affidavit" order against defendants. The court found the defendants' reasons for delayed filing of affidavits and statements to be justified, considering the delay in light of principles of natural justice. The court ordered the defendants to pay Rs. 500 as costs to the plaintiff, while permitting the defendants to file their affidavits and statements in the case concerning a property possession dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division,Miraj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case