Kamal Narayan Kanade vs Bhauso Bhimsha Teli Advocate - PATIL PURJARI ANNASO SIDGONDA — 140/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: List of Witness. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN060013212023

List of Witness

Next Hearing

29th April 2026

Filing Number

320/2023

Filing Date

16-05-2023

Registration No

140/2023

Registration Date

16-05-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Miraj

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C MIRAJ

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

Kamal Narayan Kanade

Adv. Watve Saurabh Shridhar

Rajendra Narayan Kanade

Respondent(s)

Bhauso Bhimsha Teli Advocate - PATIL PURJARI ANNASO SIDGONDA

Suresh Bhimsha Teli

Adv. PATIL PURJARI ANNASO SIDGONDA

Anandkumar Somling Teli

Adv. PATIL PURJARI ANNASO SIDGONDA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C MIRAJ

07-03-2026

List of Witness

12-01-2026

List of Witness

06-10-2025

Issues

04-09-2025

Issues

07-07-2025

Issues

Interim Orders

12-01-2026
Issues

This document appears to be a case header/issues sheet from Miraj Civil Court (R.C.S. 140/2023) between Kamal Narayan Kanade vs. Bhauso Bhimsha Teli, dated 12.01.2026. The document lists five issues to be decided regarding alleged illegal water transportation through pipes installed by the defendant on the plaintiff's western boundary, and claims for injunction and damages. However, the actual court order/judgment resolving these issues is not present in the provided document — only the case caption and list of issues are shown. Therefore, no outcome can be summarized. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document appears to be a case header/issues sheet from Miraj Civil Court (R.C.S. 140/2023) between Kamal Narayan Kanade vs. Bhauso Bhimsha Teli, dated 12.01.2026. The document lists five issues to be decided regarding alleged illegal water transportation through pipes installed by the defendant on the plaintiff's western boundary, and claims for injunction and damages. However, the actual court order/judgment resolving these issues is not present in the provided document — only the case caption and list of issues are shown. Therefore, no outcome can be summarized. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division,Miraj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case