Bhalchandra Purshottam Bhatawadekar vs Geeta Avinash Kudche Advocate - Bavchikar Umesh Kallappa — 659/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSN060012182024
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
19-05-2024
Filing Number
983/2024
Filing Date
20-05-2024
Registration No
659/2024
Registration Date
24-05-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Miraj
Judge
2-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. MIRAJ, J.M.F.C. MIRAJ
FIR Details
Police Station
Mahatma Gandhi Chowk Miraj Police Station
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhalchandra Purshottam Bhatawadekar
Adv. Porwal Praveen Dilip
Respondent(s)
Geeta Avinash Kudche Advocate - Bavchikar Umesh Kallappa
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. MIRAJ, J.M.F.C. MIRAJ
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 07-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 30-01-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 01-01-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 11-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Summary Criminal Case No. 659/2024, the Judicial Magistrate, Miraj, recorded the case details involving a cheque dishonor complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused, M/s. Shriram Enterprises, allegedly delivered a cheque for Rs. 49,00,000 on 22/03/2024 which was dishonored on 26/03/2024 with "Payment stopped by Drawers" remark. The accused denied the charges and pleaded not guilty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Summary Criminal Case No. 659/2024, the Judicial Magistrate, Miraj, recorded the case details involving a cheque dishonor complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused, M/s. Shriram Enterprises, allegedly delivered a cheque for Rs. 49,00,000 on 22/03/2024 which was dishonored on 26/03/2024 with "Payment stopped by Drawers" remark. The accused denied the charges and pleaded not guilty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts