State of Maharashtra vs Rahul Dashrath Katkar etc Advocate - Koparde Anil Ashok — 448/2021

Case under Maharashtra Money Lenders Act Section 39,45. Status: Steps_Unready. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHSN060011572021

Steps_Unready

Next Hearing

02nd May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

944/2021

Filing Date

25-06-2021

Registration No

448/2021

Registration Date

07-07-2021

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Miraj

Judge

2-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. MIRAJ, J.M.F.C. MIRAJ

FIR Details

FIR Number

60

Police Station

Mahatma Gandhi Chowk Miraj Police Station

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Money Lenders Act Section 39,45

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Rahul Dashrath Katkar etc Advocate - Koparde Anil Ashok

Vijay Hari Patgaonkar

Adv. Shaikh Mohamedhanif Abdulkadar

Jitendra Annasaheb Dhole

Adv. Narwadkar Rajeev Atmaram

Santosh Mahadev Koli

Adv. Shaikh Mohamedhanif Abdulkadar

Hearing History

Judge: 2-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. MIRAJ, J.M.F.C. MIRAJ

07-03-2026

Steps_Unready

09-01-2026

Awaiting Warrant

19-11-2025

Awaiting Warrant

03-11-2025

Awaiting Warrant

16-09-2025

Awaiting Warrant

Interim Orders

24-05-2023
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court order dated 24.05.2023 from the Civil Judge, Miraj, dismissed the petition filed by accused No. 3 (Rahul Dasrath Katkar) seeking discharge under Section 227/239 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Although a chargesheet was filed under the Maharashtra Protection of Democracy Act (MPDA) 2014, the court found sufficient grounds to proceed with the case based on evidence of extortion and harassment presented against the accused. The order directs that the case shall proceed to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court order dated 24.05.2023 from the Civil Judge, Miraj, dismissed the petition filed by accused No. 3 (Rahul Dasrath Katkar) seeking discharge under Section 227/239 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Although a chargesheet was filed under the Maharashtra Protection of Democracy Act (MPDA) 2014, the court found sufficient grounds to proceed with the case based on evidence of extortion and harassment presented against the accused. The order directs that the case shall proceed to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division,Miraj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case