Rupali Babaso Sakate vs Sachin Babaso Sakate Advocate - Palegar Irshad Babasaheb — 31/2024
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22,23. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHSN060009292024
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
e-Filing Number
04-04-2024
Filing Number
743/2024
Filing Date
06-04-2024
Registration No
31/2024
Registration Date
12-04-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Miraj
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C MIRAJ
FIR Details
Police Station
Miraj City Police Station
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rupali Babaso Sakate
Adv. Watve Sourabh Shridhar
Respondent(s)
Sachin Babaso Sakate Advocate - Palegar Irshad Babasaheb
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C MIRAJ
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 05-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 17-01-2026 | Hearing |
| 20-12-2025 | Hearing |
| 15-11-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 petition, the court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence by the respondent (husband) against the petitioner (wife), including verbal abuse, emotional cruelty, and economic harassment. The court partially granted the petition, ordering interim maintenance of ₹35,000 per month for the petitioner and her two daughters, annual educational expenses of ₹60,000 for the daughters' schooling, and issued a protective order against further harassment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 petition, the court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence by the respondent (husband) against the petitioner (wife), including verbal abuse, emotional cruelty, and economic harassment. The court partially granted the petition, ordering interim maintenance of ₹35,000 per month for the petitioner and her two daughters, annual educational expenses of ₹60,000 for the daughters' schooling, and issued a protective order against further harassment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts