Aalamagir Harunabasha Shaikh vs Mustafa Faradin Shaikh — 67/2025
Case under Specific Relief (amendment) Act Section 22,38,. Status: Notice_Unready. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN060008082025
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2025
Filing Number
144/2025
Filing Date
12-03-2025
Registration No
67/2025
Registration Date
12-03-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Miraj
Judge
3-2nd JT. CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and J.M.F.C. MIRAJ
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Aalamagir Harunabasha Shaikh
Adv. Mushrif Serab Abdulmunaf
Dastagir Harunbasha Shaikh
Adv. MUSHRIF SERAB ABDUL MUNAF
Noorjahan Sahil Mujawar
Adv. Mushrif Serab Abdulmunaf
Tabassum Mohsin Sanadi
Adv. Mushrif Serab Abdulmunaf
Suraiyya Harunabasha Shaikh
Adv. MUSHRIF SERAB ABDUL MUNAF
Respondent(s)
Mustafa Faradin Shaikh
Nasim Yasin Shaikh
Mohammed Shahid Yasin Shaikh through guardian Mother Nasim Yasin Shaikh
Abubakar Faradin Shaikh
Mahammed Hanif Fardin Shaikh
Bakhtawar Faradin Shaikh
Shama Ramzan Shaikh
Mohammed Rafik Abdul Khalil Shaikh
Salaman Mohammed Rafik Shaikh
Samina Salim Padesar
Sayarabanu Faradin Shaikh
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd JT. CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and J.M.F.C. MIRAJ
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Notice_Unready | |
| 22-12-2025 | Notice_Unready | |
| 24-11-2025 | Notice_Unready | |
| 08-09-2025 | Notice_Unready | |
| 14-08-2025 | Notice_Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: In R.C.S. No. 67/2025 before the 2nd Joint Civil Judge at Miraj, an ex parte order was passed against defendants no. 2 to 6 and 11 on 14.08.2025. The court found that summons were duly served on these defendants, but they failed to appear despite proper service, warranting the ex parte proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In R.C.S. No. 67/2025 before the 2nd Joint Civil Judge at Miraj, an ex parte order was passed against defendants no. 2 to 6 and 11 on 14.08.2025. The court found that summons were duly served on these defendants, but they failed to appear despite proper service, warranting the ex parte proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts