Balasaheb Ramchandra Dhumal vs Prakash Baburao Jujare — 52/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN060006692025
e-Filing Number
25-02-2025
Filing Number
116/2025
Filing Date
27-Feb-2025
Registration No
52/2025
Registration Date
27-Feb-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Miraj
Judge
2-Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
Last updated 13-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Balasaheb Ramchandra Dhumal
Adv. Kudache Shivputra Shankar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Prakash Baburao Jujare
-
2.Sanjay Baburao Jujare
-
3.Rural Development Officer
Case History
-
29-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Jun-2026
Issues
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
22-Apr-2026
Issues
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
25-Mar-2026
Issues
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
21-Feb-2026
Issues
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
22-Jan-2026
Issues
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
15-Dec-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
10-Dec-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
03-Dec-2025
Order on T.I.View PDF
Case Summary: R.C.S. 52/2025 Outcome: Temporary injunction partly allowed. The court restrained defendants Prakash and Sanjay Jujare from raising new permanent construction, digging borehells, installing septic tanks, or making encroachments in the disputed lane between the plaintiff's hotel property (C.S.No.666) and defendants' house (C.S.No.670). However, defendants retain the right to use the lane for access to their property as existing use. The court found a prima-facie case of threatened construction affecting the plaintiff's rights to light and air, with balance of convenience and irreparable loss favoring the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Dec-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
02-Dec-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
25-Nov-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
20-Nov-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
03-Nov-2025
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
09-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
06-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
24-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
09-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
02-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
20-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
13-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
04-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
01-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
23-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
29-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
22-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C. Miraj
-
07-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
4th Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj
-
28-Mar-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
28-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
4th Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj
-
18-Mar-2025
Awaiting Notice
4th Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj
-
01-Mar-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
01-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 52/2025
Case Summary: R.C.S. 52/2025 Outcome: Temporary injunction partly allowed. The court restrained defendants Prakash and Sanjay Jujare from raising new permanent construction, digging borehells, installing septic tanks, or making encroachments in the disputed lane between the plaintiff's hotel property (C.S.No.666) and defendants' house (C.S.No.670). However, defendants retain the right to use the lane for access to their property as existing use. The court found a prima-facie case of threatened construction affecting the plaintiff's rights to light and air, with balance of convenience and irreparable loss favoring the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts