Abubakar Gulamhusain Mulla vs Shri Dev Maruti Mandir Trusti Thr Sunil Pandurang Gurav — 76/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O39,. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN060006542023
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
177/2023
Filing Date
13-03-2023
Registration No
76/2023
Registration Date
13-03-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Miraj
Judge
3-2nd JT. CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and J.M.F.C. MIRAJ
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Abubakar Gulamhusain Mulla
Adv. Shinde Ravindra Mahadev
Kasim Badshah Mulla
Shamshoddin Badshah Mulla
Aadam Badshah Mulla
Respondent(s)
Shri Dev Maruti Mandir Trusti Thr Sunil Pandurang Gurav
Shri Dev Maruti Mandir Trusti Thr Rajkumar Pandurang Gurav
Shri Dev Maruti Mandir Trusti Thr Jitendra Pandurang Gurav
Shri Dev Maruti Mandir Trusti Thr Maruti Aappu Gurav
Shri Dev Maruti Mandir Trusti Thr Sonabai Vidyadhar Gurav
Shri Dev Maruti Mandir Trusti Thr Mohan Vidyadhar Gurav
Shri Dev Maruti Mandir Trusti Thr Ashok Vidyadhar Gurav
Shri Dev Maruti Mandir Trusti Thr Anil Vidyadhar Gurav
Shri Dev Maruti Mandir Trusti Thr Mangal Gundhar Gurav
Shri Dev Maruti Mandir Trusti Thr Prabhakar Gundhar Gurav
Shri Dev Maruti Mandir Trusti Thr Maruti Govind Gurav
Shri Dev Maruti Mandir Trusti Thr Raju Shrikant Gurav
Shri Dev Maruti Mandir Trusti Thr Sanjay Vasant Gurav
Shri Dev Maruti Mandir Trusti Thr Vijay Vasant Gurav
Gramsevak (Gramvikas Adhikari), Mhaisal
Sarpanch, Mhaisal
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd JT. CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and J.M.F.C. MIRAJ
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 27-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 12-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 19-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The court rejected the respondent's appeal and directed them to file the required affidavit within 90 days, citing unjustified delay in submission. The court imposed a cost of ₹300 on the respondent, with liability to cover case expenses if the affidavit is not filed within the stipulated timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The court rejected the respondent's appeal and directed them to file the required affidavit within 90 days, citing unjustified delay in submission. The court imposed a cost of ₹300 on the respondent, with liability to cover case expenses if the affidavit is not filed within the stipulated timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts