Sahyadri Strach And Industries Pvt Ltd Through Vishwas Kondiba Patil vs Ramesh Babaso Sargar etc. — 64/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223,61. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 02-May-2026 this date has passed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHSN060002262026

e-Filing Number

15-01-2026

Filing Number

210/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

64/2026

Registration Date

19-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Miraj

Judge

2-Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223,61
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),318(2),336(2),336(4),340(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sahyadri Strach And Industries Pvt Ltd Through Vishwas Kondiba Patil

    Adv. Sanadiip Mutaalik

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramesh Babaso Sargar etc.

  2. 2.Haridas Govind Lengere

Case History

  1. 02-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court dismissed the petition filed against the criminal case under Section 228 IPC. The petitioner's argument that the complaint was filed without proper jurisdiction and that the investigating officer exceeded authority was rejected. The court found the documents and procedure to be in order and upheld the case proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Verification

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Verification

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  7. 22-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 64/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition filed against the criminal case under Section 228 IPC. The petitioner's argument that the complaint was filed without proper jurisdiction and that the investigating officer exceeded authority was rejected. The court found the documents and procedure to be in order and upheld the case proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case