Sahyadri Strach And Industries Pvt Ltd Through Vishwas Kondiba Patil vs Shankar Ananda Jankar — 55/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223,318(4),318(2),336(2),336(4),340(2),61. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 20-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHSN060002022026

e-Filing Number

15-01-2026

Filing Number

187/2026

Filing Date

17-Jan-2026

Registration No

55/2026

Registration Date

17-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Miraj

Judge

2-Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223,318(4),318(2),336(2),336(4),340(2),61

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sahyadri Strach And Industries Pvt Ltd Through Vishwas Kondiba Patil

    Adv. Sanadiip Mutaalik

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shankar Ananda Jankar

  2. 2.Haridas Govind Lengere

Case History

  1. 20-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by the accused (Vikash Koreeba Patil, age 45, Manjirezer resident). The court found that the accused's involvement in the alleged offense is apparent from the evidence and documents on record, and therefore rejected the plea for pre-arrest bail. The matter pertains to charges under BNS Section 223 and related provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Verification

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Verification

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Miraj, J.M.F.C. Miraj

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  7. 22-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 55/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by the accused (Vikash Koreeba Patil, age 45, Manjirezer resident). The court found that the accused's involvement in the alleged offense is apparent from the evidence and documents on record, and therefore rejected the plea for pre-arrest bail. The matter pertains to charges under BNS Section 223 and related provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case