Kundatai Vishwas Patil vs Nilakshi Vishwas Patil Advocate - Patil Sunil Vilas — 698/2021

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22,19,34,38. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN050044602021

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

07th April 2026

Filing Number

1649/2021

Filing Date

25-11-2021

Registration No

698/2021

Registration Date

01-12-2021

Court

Civil Court Senior Division ,Islampur

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION ISLAMPUR

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22,19,34,38

Petitioner(s)

Kundatai Vishwas Patil

Adv. Patil Yashwant Hanamant

Swapnil Vishwas Patil

Rajendra Vishwas Patil

Respondent(s)

Nilakshi Vishwas Patil Advocate - Patil Sunil Vilas

Ashwinkumar Vishwas Patil

Adv. Patil Sunil Vilas

Sarita Manohar Pawar

Adv. Patil Sunil Vilas

Anita Vilas Patil

Adv. Patil Sunil Vilas

Pratibha Ajit Patil

Adv. Patil Sunil Vilas

Vilas Bapu Patil

Adv. Patil Sunil Vilas

Sharada Sampat Patil

Adv. Patil Sunil Vilas

Vijaykumar Sampat Patil

Adv. Patil Sunil Vilas

Sachin Sampat Patil

Adv. Patil Sunil Vilas

Sandip Sampat Patil

Adv. Patil Sunil Vilas

Niwas Bapu Patil

Adv. Patil Sunil Vilas

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION ISLAMPUR

07-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

11-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

22-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

07-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

11-12-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

19-09-2022
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: In R.C.S. No. 698/2021, the Joint Civil Judge at Islampur allowed the defendants' application and set aside the 'no written statement' order, permitting them to file their written statement despite the 7-8 month delay. The court found the defendants' reasons unjustifiable but exercised discretion in the interest of justice. The defendants were ordered to pay Rs. 1,000 costs to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In R.C.S. No. 698/2021, the Joint Civil Judge at Islampur allowed the defendants' application and set aside the 'no written statement' order, permitting them to file their written statement despite the 7-8 month delay. The court found the defendants' reasons unjustifiable but exercised discretion in the interest of justice. The defendants were ordered to pay Rs. 1,000 costs to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division ,Islampur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case