Vinayak Pandhare vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - Patil Ranjit Suresh — 119/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21,r11. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
Reg Dkst - Regular Execution Petition
CNR: MHSN050024812017
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
Filing Number
1116/2017
Filing Date
06-09-2017
Registration No
119/2017
Registration Date
12-09-2017
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Islampur
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION ISLAMPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vinayak Pandhare
Adv. Kulkarni Vinay Madhukar
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Advocate - Patil Ranjit Suresh
Special Land Acqisition Officer
Adv. Patil Ranjit Suresh
Executive Engineer, PWD
Adv. Patil Ranjit Suresh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION ISLAMPUR
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 12-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 04-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 07-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 19-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application for attachment of movables was not decided on merits. Instead, the court directed the Nazir (court officer) to submit a detailed report by October 29, 2025, accounting for the amount claimed in the execution proceeding, amounts deposited and withdrawn, and any remaining balance due. The order was passed to ascertain the actual amount payable before deciding on the attachment warrant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application for attachment of movables was not decided on merits. Instead, the court directed the Nazir (court officer) to submit a detailed report by October 29, 2025, accounting for the amount claimed in the execution proceeding, amounts deposited and withdrawn, and any remaining balance due. The order was passed to ascertain the actual amount payable before deciding on the attachment warrant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts