Sita Brhamareddi Sudamalli vs State Of Maharashtra Through Deputy Engineer Advocate - Apte Rohini Bhalchandra — 258/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN050016782024
Next Hearing
13th April 2026
e-Filing Number
10-05-2024
Filing Number
667/2024
Filing Date
10-05-2024
Registration No
258/2024
Registration Date
10-05-2024
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Islampur
Judge
2-JT CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION AND ADDL. CJM, ISLAMPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sita Brhamareddi Sudamalli
Adv. Patil Shrikant Kiranrao
Anita Subhash Patil
Adv. Patil Shrikant Kiranrao
Nitin Shivaji Patil
Adv. Patil Shrikant Kiranrao
Mansur Mubarak Sutar
Adv. Patil Shrikant Kiranrao
Raghunath Ramchandra Jadhav
Adv. Patil Shrikant Kiranrao
Respondent(s)
State Of Maharashtra Through Deputy Engineer Advocate - Apte Rohini Bhalchandra
Chief Executive Officer
Adv. Thorat Jagdish Sadashivrao
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JT CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION AND ADDL. CJM, ISLAMPUR
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 09-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 19-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 10-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 17-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary In Civil Suit No. 258/2024, the plaintiff's application for appointment of a court commissioner to inspect the suit property was rejected as premature. The court found that while expert measurement may eventually be necessary in encroachment cases, the suit is currently pending hearing on a temporary injunction application and the plaintiff has not yet adduced evidence. The court held that a court commissioner should not be appointed as a medium for evidence collection before the plaintiff proves their case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary In Civil Suit No. 258/2024, the plaintiff's application for appointment of a court commissioner to inspect the suit property was rejected as premature. The court found that while expert measurement may eventually be necessary in encroachment cases, the suit is currently pending hearing on a temporary injunction application and the plaintiff has not yet adduced evidence. The court held that a court commissioner should not be appointed as a medium for evidence collection before the plaintiff proves their case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts