State of Maharashtra - Kasegaon Police Station vs Ganesh (Barakya) Madhukar Chavan etc 1 Advocate - Pawar Popatrao Sadashiv — 76/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHSN040008932022
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
Filing Number
383/2022
Filing Date
08-09-2022
Registration No
76/2022
Registration Date
12-09-2022
Court
Add District Court , Islampur
Judge
2-ADHOC DIST. JUDGE-1 ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGEISLAMPUR
FIR Details
FIR Number
98
Police Station
Kasegaon
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra - Kasegaon Police Station
Adv. Patil Shubhangi Vikram
Respondent(s)
Ganesh (Barakya) Madhukar Chavan etc 1 Advocate - Pawar Popatrao Sadashiv
Mohan @ Balu Sahebrao Chavan
Adv. Patil Ravindra Maruti
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADHOC DIST. JUDGE-1 ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGEISLAMPUR
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 20-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 04-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 27-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The bail application filed by accused no.2 Mohan Sahebrao Chavan under Section 483 B.N.S.S. for offences under Section 302 I.P.C. (murder) has been rejected. The court found that although the accused has been in judicial custody for over one year, releasing him on bail would not be in the interest of justice given his previous breach of bail conditions, the serious nature of the offence, and the risk of witness tampering. The prosecution has been directed to secure the presence of co-accused no.1 and expedite the trial to completion within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The bail application filed by accused no.2 Mohan Sahebrao Chavan under Section 483 B.N.S.S. for offences under Section 302 I.P.C. (murder) has been rejected. The court found that although the accused has been in judicial custody for over one year, releasing him on bail would not be in the interest of justice given his previous breach of bail conditions, the serious nature of the offence, and the risk of witness tampering. The prosecution has been directed to secure the presence of co-accused no.1 and expedite the trial to completion within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts