Sujata Balaso Shelake etc 3 vs Tarabai Aannappa Shelake etc 21 Advocate - Gurav Sandip Pandurang — 48/2025

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.

Reply/Say Next hearing 13-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHSN040008332025

e-Filing Number

28-11-2025

Filing Number

672/2025

Filing Date

01-Dec-2025

Registration No

48/2025

Registration Date

01-Dec-2025

Court

Add District Court , Islampur

Judge

2-Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sujata Balaso Shelake etc 3

    Adv. Bhoite Pratapsinh Vasantrao

  2. 2.Dadaso Jinnappa Shelake

    Adv. Bhoite Pratapsinh Vasantrao

  3. 3.Raju Manohar Shelake

    Adv. Bhoite Pratapsinh Vasantrao

  4. 4.Sanju Manohar Shelake

    Adv. Bhoite Pratapsinh Vasantrao

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tarabai Aannappa Shelake etc 21 Advocate - Gurav Sandip Pandurang

  2. 2.Vikas Aannappa Shelake

  3. 3.Suresh Janardan Shelake

  4. 4.Anil Janardan Shelake

  5. 5.Tanaji Janardan Shelake

  6. 6.Shila Dilip Hoval

  7. 7.Vatsla Manohar Shelake

  8. 8.Phulabai Jinnappa Shelake

  9. 9.Balabai Shamrao Shelake

  10. 10.Aashutosh Shamrao Shelake

  11. 11.Kalpana Pankaj Sawant

  12. 12.Yojana Sarjerao Madhale

  13. 13.Sulabha Manish Kambale

  14. 14.Vikram Vilas Sawant

  15. 15.Rajesh Babaso Desai

  16. 16.Rajendra Vilas Magdum

  17. 17.Prakash Ananda Kumbhar

  18. 18.Isak Yusuf Chougule

  19. 19.Ramesh Ganapatrao Shelake

  20. 20.Sanjivani Vidyaprasad Shelake

  21. 21.Shrusthi Vidyaprasad Shelake

  22. 22.Maitriya Vidyaprasad Shelake

Case History

  1. 13-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary Application Rejected. The court denied the appellants' application for stay of execution of a 2017 partition decree, finding they were not diligent in protecting their rights. The applicants filed the delay condonation application nearly 2,971 days after the original judgment and failed to demonstrate reasonable grounds for the delay, despite having appeared in the original suit and subsequent execution proceedings. The court held that parties cannot rely solely on advocate negligence to excuse their own procedural responsibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  8. 28-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  10. 10-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  11. 29-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  12. 16-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  13. 15-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  14. 26-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  15. 04-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  16. 04-Dec-2025

    Order on T.I.View PDF

  17. 04-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 01-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 48/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Application Rejected. The court denied the appellants' application for stay of execution of a 2017 partition decree, finding they were not diligent in protecting their rights. The applicants filed the delay condonation application nearly 2,971 days after the original judgment and failed to demonstrate reasonable grounds for the delay, despite having appeared in the original suit and subsequent execution proceedings. The court held that parties cannot rely solely on advocate negligence to excuse their own procedural responsibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case