State of Maharashtra Through Islampur Police Station vs Arvind Alias Raghu Subhash Satham etc.1 Advocate - Kaingade Vijay Shankar — 23/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHSN040006032025
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
e-Filing Number
23-07-2025
Filing Number
181/2025
Filing Date
04-08-2025
Registration No
23/2025
Registration Date
04-08-2025
Court
Add District Court , Islampur
Judge
2-ADHOC DIST. JUDGE-1 ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGEISLAMPUR
FIR Details
FIR Number
205
Police Station
Islampur
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Islampur Police Station
Adv. Patil Shubhangi Vikram
Respondent(s)
Arvind Alias Raghu Subhash Satham etc.1 Advocate - Kaingade Vijay Shankar
Kiran Ramchandra Satpute
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADHOC DIST. JUDGE-1 ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGEISLAMPUR
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 23-01-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Bail Application Rejected The Additional Sessions Judge at Islampur rejected the bail application filed by accused Arvind @ Raghu Subhash Satam in a murder case. The court found the offense serious, noting strong circumstantial evidence of premeditation (prior enmity and motive) and risk of witness tampering. Although witness statements contained inconsistencies, the court distinguished this case from the co-accused (who was already released on bail), emphasizing that the primary accused had a more direct culpable role in the fatal attack that killed Sourabh Kerlekar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Bail Application Rejected The Additional Sessions Judge at Islampur rejected the bail application filed by accused Arvind @ Raghu Subhash Satam in a murder case. The court found the offense serious, noting strong circumstantial evidence of premeditation (prior enmity and motive) and risk of witness tampering. Although witness statements contained inconsistencies, the court distinguished this case from the co-accused (who was already released on bail), emphasizing that the primary accused had a more direct culpable role in the fatal attack that killed Sourabh Kerlekar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts