State of Maharashtra Through Islampur Police Station vs Arvind Alias Raghu Subhash Satham etc.1 Advocate - Kaingade Vijay Shankar — 23/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 06-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Sessions Case

CNR: MHSN040006032025

e-Filing Number

23-07-2025

Filing Number

181/2025

Filing Date

04-Aug-2025

Registration No

23/2025

Registration Date

04-Aug-2025

Court

Add District Court , Islampur

Judge

2-Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

205

Police Station

Islampur

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through Islampur Police Station

    Adv. Patil Shubhangi Vikram

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Arvind Alias Raghu Subhash Satham etc.1 Advocate - Kaingade Vijay Shankar

  2. 2.Kiran Ramchandra Satpute

Case History

  1. 06-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  6. 23-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  7. 09-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  8. 26-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  9. 17-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Bail Application Rejected The Additional Sessions Judge at Islampur rejected the bail application filed by accused Arvind @ Raghu Subhash Satam in a murder case. The court found the offense serious, noting strong circumstantial evidence of premeditation (prior enmity and motive) and risk of witness tampering. Although witness statements contained inconsistencies, the court distinguished this case from the co-accused (who was already released on bail), emphasizing that the primary accused had a more direct culpable role in the fatal attack that killed Sourabh Kerlekar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 17-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  11. 10-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  12. 05-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  13. 20-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  14. 10-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  15. 29-Oct-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  16. 15-Oct-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  17. 09-Oct-2025

    Formal Hearing

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  18. 30-Sep-2025

    Report

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  19. 23-Sep-2025

    Charge

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  20. 15-Sep-2025

    Charge

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  21. 03-Sep-2025

    Charge

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  22. 28-Aug-2025

    Charge

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  23. 21-Aug-2025

    Charge

    Adhoc Dist. Judge-1 Addl.sessions Judgeislampur

  24. 08-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 04-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 23/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Bail Application Rejected The Additional Sessions Judge at Islampur rejected the bail application filed by accused Arvind @ Raghu Subhash Satam in a murder case. The court found the offense serious, noting strong circumstantial evidence of premeditation (prior enmity and motive) and risk of witness tampering. Although witness statements contained inconsistencies, the court distinguished this case from the co-accused (who was already released on bail), emphasizing that the primary accused had a more direct culpable role in the fatal attack that killed Sourabh Kerlekar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case