State of Maharashtra Through Islampur Police Station vs Arvind Alias Raghu Subhash Satham etc.1 Advocate - Kaingade Vijay Shankar — 23/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: MHSN040006032025

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

06th April 2026

e-Filing Number

23-07-2025

Filing Number

181/2025

Filing Date

04-08-2025

Registration No

23/2025

Registration Date

04-08-2025

Court

Add District Court , Islampur

Judge

2-ADHOC DIST. JUDGE-1 ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGEISLAMPUR

FIR Details

FIR Number

205

Police Station

Islampur

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Through Islampur Police Station

Adv. Patil Shubhangi Vikram

Respondent(s)

Arvind Alias Raghu Subhash Satham etc.1 Advocate - Kaingade Vijay Shankar

Kiran Ramchandra Satpute

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADHOC DIST. JUDGE-1 ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGEISLAMPUR

23-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

07-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

23-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

06-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

23-01-2026

Hearing

Interim Orders

17-12-2025
Order on Exhibit

Bail Application Rejected The Additional Sessions Judge at Islampur rejected the bail application filed by accused Arvind @ Raghu Subhash Satam in a murder case. The court found the offense serious, noting strong circumstantial evidence of premeditation (prior enmity and motive) and risk of witness tampering. Although witness statements contained inconsistencies, the court distinguished this case from the co-accused (who was already released on bail), emphasizing that the primary accused had a more direct culpable role in the fatal attack that killed Sourabh Kerlekar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Bail Application Rejected The Additional Sessions Judge at Islampur rejected the bail application filed by accused Arvind @ Raghu Subhash Satam in a murder case. The court found the offense serious, noting strong circumstantial evidence of premeditation (prior enmity and motive) and risk of witness tampering. Although witness statements contained inconsistencies, the court distinguished this case from the co-accused (who was already released on bail), emphasizing that the primary accused had a more direct culpable role in the fatal attack that killed Sourabh Kerlekar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Add District Court , Islampur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case