Manisha prakash Nikam/ Gund vs State of Maharashtra Through Kasegaon Police Station — 28/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 01st April 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHSN040002032026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
58/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
28/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Add District Court , Islampur
Judge
2-ADHOC DIST. JUDGE-1 ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGEISLAMPUR
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
30
Police Station
Kasegaon
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manisha prakash Nikam/ Gund
Adv. Kharat Vijay Krishnarao
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Kasegaon Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADHOC DIST. JUDGE-1 ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGEISLAMPUR
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court granted bail to Manisha Nikam in a criminal case involving serious charges under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The judge found that although the accused had minimal involvement compared to co-accused family members, her detention was unjustified given she has no criminal history, three minor children requiring care during board examinations, and one month had passed allowing sufficient investigation time. Bail was conditional on police station attendance every alternate day, non-communication with the informant, and avoiding similar incidents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court granted bail to Manisha Nikam in a criminal case involving serious charges under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The judge found that although the accused had minimal involvement compared to co-accused family members, her detention was unjustified given she has no criminal history, three minor children requiring care during board examinations, and one month had passed allowing sufficient investigation time. Bail was conditional on police station attendance every alternate day, non-communication with the informant, and avoiding similar incidents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts