Kalavati Tanaji Bhalekar etc 1 vs Indubai Hari Patil etc — 10/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O43R1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th March 2026.
M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal
CNR: MHSN040001392026
e-Filing Number
13-02-2026
Filing Number
113/2026
Filing Date
16-Feb-2026
Registration No
10/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Court
Add District Court , Islampur
Judge
7-District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Islampur
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kalavati Tanaji Bhalekar etc 1
Adv. Satish Kadam
-
2.Shevantabai Vishnu Salunkhe
Adv. Satish Kadam
Respondent(s)
-
1.Indubai Hari Patil etc
-
2.Shankar Hari Patil
-
3.Uttam Hari Patil
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The District Judge of Sangli dismissed the plaintiff's appeal seeking interim injunction against the defendants' construction on disputed property (Plot No. 273). The court found insufficient prima facie evidence that the defendants' building encroaches on the plaintiff's land, as the plaintiff failed to produce necessary site plans and conduct joint land measurement despite the defendants' objections. The court upheld the lower court's order dismissing the interim relief application, noting the parties could resolve the dispute through joint measurement and the lower court retains authority to pass appropriate orders based on substantive evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Islampur
-
07-Mar-2026
Judgment
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Islampur
-
27-Feb-2026
Awaiting Summons
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Islampur
-
18-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 10/2026
Summary The District Judge of Sangli dismissed the plaintiff's appeal seeking interim injunction against the defendants' construction on disputed property (Plot No. 273). The court found insufficient prima facie evidence that the defendants' building encroaches on the plaintiff's land, as the plaintiff failed to produce necessary site plans and conduct joint land measurement despite the defendants' objections. The court upheld the lower court's order dismissing the interim relief application, noting the parties could resolve the dispute through joint measurement and the lower court retains authority to pass appropriate orders based on substantive evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts