State of Maharashtra - Islampur Police Station vs Swapnil Subhash Mane etc 2 Advocate - Rajwardhan Manoj Balaso — 7/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,354A(1),323,506,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHSN040000822024
Next Hearing
13th April 2026
Filing Number
28/2024
Filing Date
23-01-2024
Registration No
7/2024
Registration Date
24-01-2024
Court
Add District Court , Islampur
Judge
2-ADHOC DIST. JUDGE-1 ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGEISLAMPUR
FIR Details
FIR Number
228
Police Station
Islampur
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra - Islampur Police Station
Adv. Patil Shubhangi Vikram
Respondent(s)
Swapnil Subhash Mane etc 2 Advocate - Rajwardhan Manoj Balaso
Tanaji Maruti Jadhav
Adv. Kaingade Vijay Shankar
Jayashree Tanaji Jadhav
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADHOC DIST. JUDGE-1 ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGEISLAMPUR
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 02-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge at Islampur rejected accused Swapnil Subhash Mane's discharge application under Section 227 CrPC in a rape case. The court found a prima facie case against the accused based on the FIR, complainant's statement, medical evidence showing signs of sexual intercourse, and witness statements, holding that discrepancies in statements cannot be used to discharge the accused at the preliminary stage before trial commencement. The case will proceed to trial where the prosecution must prove charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge at Islampur rejected accused Swapnil Subhash Mane's discharge application under Section 227 CrPC in a rape case. The court found a prima facie case against the accused based on the FIR, complainant's statement, medical evidence showing signs of sexual intercourse, and witness statements, holding that discrepancies in statements cannot be used to discharge the accused at the preliminary stage before trial commencement. The case will proceed to trial where the prosecution must prove charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts