State of Maharashtra - Ashta Police Station vs Ankit Naresh Rathor etc 1 Advocate - Kharat Vijay Krishnarao — 3/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,504,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHSN040000662024
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
Filing Number
21/2024
Filing Date
17-01-2024
Registration No
3/2024
Registration Date
18-01-2024
Court
Add District Court , Islampur
Judge
3-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, ISLAMPUR
FIR Details
FIR Number
285
Police Station
Ashta
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra - Ashta Police Station
Adv. Patil Shubhangi Vikram
Respondent(s)
Ankit Naresh Rathor etc 1 Advocate - Kharat Vijay Krishnarao
Pratik Bharat Jagtap
Adv. Ghatage Dhananjay Balkrishna
Hearing History
Judge: 3-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, ISLAMPUR
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 28-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Bail application rejected. Accused Ankit Naresh Rathor's second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a murder case (IPC §302, 504 r.w. 34 and SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act §3(2)(va)) was dismissed on 27/10/2025. The court found that despite only one witness being examined, substantial trial progress has occurred through charge framing, forensic analysis completion, and electronic evidence production, with delays attributable partly to the accused's own conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Bail application rejected. Accused Ankit Naresh Rathor's second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a murder case (IPC §302, 504 r.w. 34 and SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act §3(2)(va)) was dismissed on 27/10/2025. The court found that despite only one witness being examined, substantial trial progress has occurred through charge framing, forensic analysis completion, and electronic evidence production, with delays attributable partly to the accused's own conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts