Shreemata Co Op Credit Society Ltd Multistate Through Abhijieet D Nage vs Sunny Mohan Chopde — 3770/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Notice_Unready. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.

Notice_Unready Next hearing 22-Jul-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSN030056142025

e-Filing Number

30-11-2025

Filing Number

5614/2025

Filing Date

01-Dec-2025

Registration No

3770/2025

Registration Date

04-Dec-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangli

Judge

6-VIth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli

Last updated 13-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shreemata Co Op Credit Society Ltd Multistate Through Abhijieet D Nage

    Adv. Potdar Sidhanath Uday

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sunny Mohan Chopde

Case History

  1. 22-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 3770/2025 Summary: The 3rd Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sangli issued process against accused Sani Chopade for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. The court found prima facie sufficient material that the cheque was deposited within valid period, notice was issued within limitation and served on the accused, yet he failed to repay the amount despite notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Notice_Unready

    IIIrd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Verification

    IIIrd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli

  5. 15-Jan-2026

    Verification

    IIIrd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli

  6. 12-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 01-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3770/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 3770/2025 Summary: The 3rd Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sangli issued process against accused Sani Chopade for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. The court found prima facie sufficient material that the cheque was deposited within valid period, notice was issued within limitation and served on the accused, yet he failed to repay the amount despite notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case