State of Maharashtra vs Pawan Suresh Pawar — 2377/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSN030037402025

Filing Number

3740/2025

Filing Date

22-Aug-2025

Registration No

2377/2025

Registration Date

03-Sep-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangli

Judge

7-IVth Jt. Cjjd JMFC. Sangli

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 13-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

295

Police Station

VISHRAMBHAG POLICE STATION SANGLI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. Dadape Aditi Rajesh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pawan Suresh Pawar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sangli convicted Pawan Suresh Pawar, 24, of being found drunk in public at Market Yard on 13.08.2025, in violation of Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily, and considering his status as the sole earner of a poor family, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs.500 fine with 3 days simple imprisonment in default of payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-May-2026

    Disposed

    IVth Jt. Cjjd JMFC. Sangli

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    First Order

    IVth Jt. Cjjd JMFC. Sangli

  5. 19-Dec-2025

    First Order

    IVth Jt. Cjjd JMFC. Sangli

  6. 29-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 22-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2377/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sangli convicted Pawan Suresh Pawar, 24, of being found drunk in public at Market Yard on 13.08.2025, in violation of Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily, and considering his status as the sole earner of a poor family, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs.500 fine with 3 days simple imprisonment in default of payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case