Karmveer Bhaurao Patil Na Sah Pat Ltd Thr Sukant Jayakumar Chougule vs Amruta Bhimrao Kulkarni — 2355/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Notice_Unready. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSN030037152025
e-Filing Number
21-08-2025
Filing Number
3715/2025
Filing Date
25-Aug-2025
Registration No
2355/2025
Registration Date
02-Sep-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangli
Judge
3-IIIrd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Karmveer Bhaurao Patil Na Sah Pat Ltd Thr Sukant Jayakumar Chougule
Adv. Chougule Jayvardhan Narsappa
Respondent(s)
-
1.Amruta Bhimrao Kulkarni
Case History
-
04-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Notice_Unready
IIIrd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
01-Jan-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary Case: Karmveer Bhaurao Pat Sanstha vs. Amruta Kulkarni (S.C.C. No. 2355/2025) Outcome: Process issued against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. The court found prima facie sufficient material to proceed, as the cheque was deposited within the valid period, notice was issued within limitation and served on the accused, yet the accused failed to repay the cheque amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Jan-2026
Notice_Unready
IIIrd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
03-Dec-2025
Verification
IIIrd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
04-Nov-2025
Verification
IIIrd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
09-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2355/2025
Case Summary Case: Karmveer Bhaurao Pat Sanstha vs. Amruta Kulkarni (S.C.C. No. 2355/2025) Outcome: Process issued against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. The court found prima facie sufficient material to proceed, as the cheque was deposited within the valid period, notice was issued within limitation and served on the accused, yet the accused failed to repay the cheque amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts