Mrunal Gautam Khandekar vs State of Maharashtra — 425/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 07th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSN030033252025
e-Filing Number
04-08-2025
Filing Number
3325/2025
Filing Date
06-08-2025
Registration No
425/2025
Registration Date
07-08-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangli
Judge
1-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SANGLI
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mrunal Gautam Khandekar
Adv. Keripale Dhanashree Kisanrao
Gautam Vishnu Khandekar
Adv. Keripale Dhanashree Kisanrao
Akhil Gautam Khandekar
Adv. Keripale Dhanashree Kisanrao
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SANGLI
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 21-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 12-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 10-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangli allowed the application to release Rs. 2,10,435/- withheld in a bank account following a cyber fraud complaint. The court found that applicants had transferred the amount to the account as victims of romance scam by "Daiji Hakue" and that the account holder (Parveen Shaikh) had not claimed the funds and opened the account only at a fraudster's direction. The court ordered release of the amount to applicant no. 1 upon execution of an indemnity bond and proper verification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangli allowed the application to release Rs. 2,10,435/- withheld in a bank account following a cyber fraud complaint. The court found that applicants had transferred the amount to the account as victims of romance scam by "Daiji Hakue" and that the account holder (Parveen Shaikh) had not claimed the funds and opened the account only at a fraudster's direction. The court ordered release of the amount to applicant no. 1 upon execution of an indemnity bond and proper verification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts