Mrunal Gautam Khandekar vs State of Maharashtra — 425/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 07th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSN030033252025
e-Filing Number
04-08-2025
Filing Number
3325/2025
Filing Date
06-Aug-2025
Registration No
425/2025
Registration Date
07-Aug-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangli
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mrunal Gautam Khandekar
Adv. Keripale Dhanashree Kisanrao
-
2.Gautam Vishnu Khandekar
Adv. Keripale Dhanashree Kisanrao
-
3.Akhil Gautam Khandekar
Adv. Keripale Dhanashree Kisanrao
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangli allowed the application to release Rs. 2,10,435/- withheld in a bank account following a cyber fraud complaint. The court found that applicants had transferred the amount to the account as victims of romance scam by "Daiji Hakue" and that the account holder (Parveen Shaikh) had not claimed the funds and opened the account only at a fraudster's direction. The court ordered release of the amount to applicant no. 1 upon execution of an indemnity bond and proper verification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
28-Feb-2026
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
21-Feb-2026
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
12-Feb-2026
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
10-Feb-2026
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
04-Feb-2026
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
21-Jan-2026
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
19-Jan-2026
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
13-Jan-2026
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
12-Jan-2026
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
07-Jan-2026
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
22-Dec-2025
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
17-Dec-2025
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
10-Dec-2025
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
09-Dec-2025
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
06-Dec-2025
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
26-Nov-2025
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
24-Nov-2025
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
21-Nov-2025
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
18-Nov-2025
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
13-Nov-2025
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
11-Nov-2025
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
04-Nov-2025
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
01-Nov-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
01-Nov-2025
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
27-Oct-2025
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
13-Oct-2025
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
09-Oct-2025
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
30-Sep-2025
Order on Exh
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
18-Sep-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
10-Sep-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
04-Sep-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sangli
-
19-Aug-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
19-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 425/2025
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangli allowed the application to release Rs. 2,10,435/- withheld in a bank account following a cyber fraud complaint. The court found that applicants had transferred the amount to the account as victims of romance scam by "Daiji Hakue" and that the account holder (Parveen Shaikh) had not claimed the funds and opened the account only at a fraudster's direction. The court ordered release of the amount to applicant no. 1 upon execution of an indemnity bond and proper verification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts