Karmveer Bhaurao Patil Na Sah Pat Ltd Thr Sanket Suresh Chougule vs Abhishek Arunkumar Jadhav — 1871/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Notice_Unready. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSN030028652025
e-Filing Number
10-07-2025
Filing Number
2865/2025
Filing Date
15-Jul-2025
Registration No
1871/2025
Registration Date
17-Jul-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangli
Judge
6-VIth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
Last updated 13-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Karmveer Bhaurao Patil Na Sah Pat Ltd Thr Sanket Suresh Chougule
Adv. Chougule Jayvardhan Narsappa
Respondent(s)
-
1.Abhishek Arunkumar Jadhav
Case History
-
22-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 1871/2025 The court found prima facie sufficient evidence that accused Abhishek Jadhav committed an offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (dishonored cheque). The court issued process against the accused, noting the cheque was deposited within validity period, notice was served within limitation, and despite notice, the accused failed to repay the cheque amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-May-2026
Notice_Unready
IIIrd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
25-Mar-2026
Verification
IIIrd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
15-Jan-2026
Verification
IIIrd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
11-Dec-2025
Verification
IIIrd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
31-Oct-2025
Verification
IIIrd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
30-Sep-2025
Verification
IIIrd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
28-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1871/2025
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 1871/2025 The court found prima facie sufficient evidence that accused Abhishek Jadhav committed an offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (dishonored cheque). The court issued process against the accused, noting the cheque was deposited within validity period, notice was served within limitation, and despite notice, the accused failed to repay the cheque amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts