SHRIRAM FINANCE LTD Br TASGAON vs Vikram Santosh Jadhav — 1625/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Notice_Unready. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSN030024422025
e-Filing Number
04-06-2025
Filing Number
2442/2025
Filing Date
21-Jun-2025
Registration No
1625/2025
Registration Date
03-Jul-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangli
Judge
3-IIIrd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRIRAM FINANCE LTD Br TASGAON
Adv. Patil Vishal Balgonda
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vikram Santosh Jadhav
Case History
-
02-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
01-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The court issued process against accused Vikram Santosh Jadhav for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, in a cheque bounce case filed by Shriram Finance Ltd. The court found prima facie sufficient material to proceed after determining that the cheque was deposited within the valid period, notice was issued within limitation, and the accused failed to repay the amount despite being served notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Notice_Unready
IIIrd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
07-Mar-2026
Verification
IIIrd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
31-Jan-2026
Verification
IIIrd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
23-Dec-2025
Verification
IIIrd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
25-Nov-2025
Verification
IIIrd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
10-Oct-2025
Verification
IIIrd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
25-Aug-2025
Verification
IIIrd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
14-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1625/2025
Summary: The court issued process against accused Vikram Santosh Jadhav for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, in a cheque bounce case filed by Shriram Finance Ltd. The court found prima facie sufficient material to proceed after determining that the cheque was deposited within the valid period, notice was issued within limitation, and the accused failed to repay the amount despite being served notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts