State of Maharashtra vs Pradip Gaurihar Shete etc — 382/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 326,324,323,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 08th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHSN030023222024
Filing Number
2322/2024
Filing Date
10-Jul-2024
Registration No
382/2024
Registration Date
29-Jul-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangli
Judge
5-Vth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 13-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
180
Police Station
SANGLI CITY POLICE STATION SANGLI
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pradip Gaurihar Shete etc
-
2.Pramod Annappa Savalge
-
3.Firoj Gulab Mujavar
-
4.Akshay Basavraj Kore
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pradip Gaurihar Shete & Others (382/2024) The court acquitted all four accused under IPC sections 326, 324, 323, 504, 506 with section 34, finding insufficient evidence to establish the prosecution's allegations of assault and criminal intimidation. The prosecution alleged the accused beat the complainant on 04/04/2024, but witness testimony contradicted the FIR narrative, with all three prosecution witnesses denying any assault or threats occurred, instead confirming only a minor altercation. Given the contradictions, lack of corroborating medical evidence linking injuries to the accused, and an out-of-court settlement between parties, the court granted the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Disposed
Vth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
29-Apr-2026
Arguments
Vth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
09-Apr-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence
Vth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
25-Mar-2026
Evidence
Vth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence
Vth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence
Vth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
05-Dec-2025
Evidence
Vth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
27-Oct-2025
Evidence
Vth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
25-Aug-2025
Evidence
Vth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
21-Jul-2025
Evidence
Vth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
19-Jul-2025
Evidence
Vth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
18-Jul-2025
Evidence
Vth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
17-Jul-2025
Evidence
Vth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
16-Jul-2025
Evidence
Vth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
15-Jul-2025
Evidence
Vth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
14-Jul-2025
Evidence
Vth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
11-Jul-2025
Evidence
Vth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
10-Jul-2025
Evidence
Vth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
09-Jul-2025
Evidence
Vth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
08-Jul-2025
Evidence
Vth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
07-Jul-2025
Evidence
Vth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
05-Jul-2025
Evidence
Vth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
04-Jul-2025
Evidence
Vth Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
04-Jun-2025
Evidence
IXth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Sangli
-
19-May-2025
Evidence
IXth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Sangli
-
08-May-2025
Charge
IXth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Sangli
-
20-Feb-2025
Appearance
XI Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
09-Jan-2025
Appearance
XI Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
29-Nov-2024
Appearance
XI Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
11-Oct-2024
Appearance
XI Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
-
23-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 382/2024
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pradip Gaurihar Shete & Others (382/2024) The court acquitted all four accused under IPC sections 326, 324, 323, 504, 506 with section 34, finding insufficient evidence to establish the prosecution's allegations of assault and criminal intimidation. The prosecution alleged the accused beat the complainant on 04/04/2024, but witness testimony contradicted the FIR narrative, with all three prosecution witnesses denying any assault or threats occurred, instead confirming only a minor altercation. Given the contradictions, lack of corroborating medical evidence linking injuries to the accused, and an out-of-court settlement between parties, the court granted the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts