The State of Maharashtra vs Prakash Mangaldas Shah etc 19 Advocate - Kulkarni Mayuresh Bhalchandra — 300175/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,34. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHSN030010872015
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
301074/2015
Filing Date
08-04-2015
Registration No
300175/2015
Registration Date
09-04-2015
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangli
Judge
1-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SANGLI
FIR Details
FIR Number
85
Police Station
VISHRAMBHAG POLICE STATION SANGLI
Year
2012
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. Sabale Nilima Yogesh
Respondent(s)
Prakash Mangaldas Shah etc 19 Advocate - Kulkarni Mayuresh Bhalchandra
Bapu Rama Kamble
Rajaram Govind Jadhav Deceases
Adv. Jadhav Shreekant Tatyasaheb
Sanjay Ramchandra Kore
Adv. Kulkarni Mayuresh Bhalchandra
Kiran Rajgonda Patil
Adv. Kulkarni Mayuresh Bhalchandra
Sachin Shankar Dhanve
Adv. Kulkarni Mayuresh Bhalchandra
Gopal Lingappa Malge
Gopal Ganpati Shintre
Yogesh Maruti Koli
Adv. Kulkarni Mayuresh Bhalchandra
Shakil Sayyad Mulani
Adv. Kulkarni Mayuresh Bhalchandra
Yashwant Shankar Mali
Adv. Kulkarni Mayuresh Bhalchandra
Minakshi Hrushikesh Ladda
Adv. Kulkarni Mayuresh Bhalchandra
Hrushikesh Rajendra Ladda
Adv. Kulkarni Mayuresh Bhalchandra
Manoj Gowardhan Biyani
Adv. Kulkarni Mayuresh Bhalchandra
Rahim Rajesaheb Hattiwale
Adv. Kulkarni Mayuresh Bhalchandra
Umesh Gopal Shintre
Adv. Patil Nitin Ashok
Suresh Amritlal Parekh
Adv. Kulkarni Mayuresh Bhalchandra
Arvind Satyanarayan Ladda
Adv. Kulkarni Mayuresh Bhalchandra
Paresh Sundarlal Shaha
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SANGLI
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 07-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 13-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 11-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 09-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by accused No. 15 for a "no objection" certificate to renew his passport for ten years was allowed. The court issued the certificate while clarifying that passport renewal alone does not constitute permission to travel abroad; the accused must seek court permission before traveling to any country and must file an undertaking not to misuse the passport. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by accused No. 15 for a "no objection" certificate to renew his passport for ten years was allowed. The court issued the certificate while clarifying that passport renewal alone does not constitute permission to travel abroad; the accused must seek court permission before traveling to any country and must file an undertaking not to misuse the passport. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts