Antyoday Nidhi Limited Through Pramod P Uchitkar vs Hina Mohmmad Mulani — 480/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Notice_Unready. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.

Notice_Unready Next hearing 29-Apr-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSN030008132026

e-Filing Number

12-02-2026

Filing Number

813/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

480/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangli

Judge

3-IIIrd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Antyoday Nidhi Limited Through Pramod P Uchitkar

    Adv. Chougule Jayvardhan Narsappa

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Hina Mohmmad Mulani

Case History

  1. 29-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court issued process (criminal summons) against the accused, Hina Mohammad Mulani, for the offense punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 in a cheque bounce case filed by Antyoday Nidhi Ltd. The magistrate found prima facie sufficient material to proceed, noting that the cheque was deposited within the valid period, notice was issued within limitation and served on the accused, yet the accused failed to repay the cheque amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Notice_Unready

    IIIrd Jt. CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 480/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court issued process (criminal summons) against the accused, Hina Mohammad Mulani, for the offense punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 in a cheque bounce case filed by Antyoday Nidhi Ltd. The magistrate found prima facie sufficient material to proceed, noting that the cheque was deposited within the valid period, notice was issued within limitation and served on the accused, yet the accused failed to repay the cheque amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case