State of Maharashtra vs Shubham Manik Kadam — 44/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 07th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSN030003852026
Filing Number
385/2026
Filing Date
22-01-2026
Registration No
44/2026
Registration Date
23-01-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangli
Judge
3-IIIrd Jt. CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C. SANGLI
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
134
Police Station
SANGLI CITY POLICE STATION SANGLI
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Dadape Aditi Rajesh
Respondent(s)
Shubham Manik Kadam
Hearing History
Judge: 3-IIIrd Jt. CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C. SANGLI
Disposed
Report
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-02-2026 | Report |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court granted a petition to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Petition 44/2026) against the accused under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 84. The court found that there was an unreasonable two-year delay in filing the chargesheet despite investigation being completed by March 12, 2023, and this delay could not be justified by the investigating officer's reasons. The court ruled that since the chargesheet was not filed within the statutory period required under CrPC Section 468(2) for offenses carrying only fine punishment, the petition to quash the proceedings was admitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted a petition to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Petition 44/2026) against the accused under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 84. The court found that there was an unreasonable two-year delay in filing the chargesheet despite investigation being completed by March 12, 2023, and this delay could not be justified by the investigating officer's reasons. The court ruled that since the chargesheet was not filed within the statutory period required under CrPC Section 468(2) for offenses carrying only fine punishment, the petition to quash the proceedings was admitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts