Mallesh Laxman Latti vs Sangita Ravi Gidwani — 378/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: W.S. and Say. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN020025072025
e-Filing Number
18-12-2025
Filing Number
2616/2025
Filing Date
18-Dec-2025
Registration No
378/2025
Registration Date
18-Dec-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Sangli
Judge
3-Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Sangli
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mallesh Laxman Latti
Adv. Kabadage Gajendra Surendra
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sangita Ravi Gidwani
Case History
-
07-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary In RCS No. 378/2025 (Mallesh Laxman Latti v. Sangita Ravi Gidwani), the Joint Civil Judge ordered that "no written statement (W.S.) order is passed against the defendant" on 18/03/2026 due to the defendant's repeated non-appearance and failure to file a written statement despite prior opportunities. The defendant's subsequently filed adjournment application became infructuous as no one appeared to mention it before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
W.S. and Say
Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Sangli
-
07-Mar-2026
W.S. and Say
Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Sangli
-
11-Feb-2026
W.S. and Say
Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Sangli
-
29-Jan-2026
W.S. and Say
Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Sangli
-
09-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Sangli
-
24-Dec-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
24-Dec-2025
First Order
Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Sangli
-
22-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 378/2025
Summary In RCS No. 378/2025 (Mallesh Laxman Latti v. Sangita Ravi Gidwani), the Joint Civil Judge ordered that "no written statement (W.S.) order is passed against the defendant" on 18/03/2026 due to the defendant's repeated non-appearance and failure to file a written statement despite prior opportunities. The defendant's subsequently filed adjournment application became infructuous as no one appeared to mention it before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts