Prasad Ashok Chavan vs State of Maharashtra through Collector Advocate - Kulkarni Vinay Madhukar — 363/2021

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 20-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN020023732021

Filing Number

2007/2021

Filing Date

22-Nov-2021

Registration No

363/2021

Registration Date

27-Nov-2021

Court

Civil Court Senior Division ,Sangli

Judge

2-Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division Sangli

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Prasad Ashok Chavan

    Adv. Patil Naresh Bhujgonda

  2. 2.Gopal Ashok Chavan

    Adv. Patil Naresh Bhujgonda

  3. 3.Rukmini Ashok Chavan

    Adv. Patil Naresh Bhujgonda

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through Collector Advocate - Kulkarni Vinay Madhukar

  2. 2.State of Maharashtra Through Tahsildar Jat

  3. 3.Deputy Engineer

  4. 4.Chief Executive Officer

  5. 5.Block Development Officer Jat

  6. 6.Shital Sadashiv Phadake

Case History

  1. 20-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division Sangli

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division Sangli

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The application for amendment of the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been allowed. The court found that the proposed amendment to paragraph 3 of the plaint is explanatory in nature and necessary for effectual decision of the suit, as the plaintiffs obtained crucial information about the government's road widening work during the pendency of the suit. The defendants did not deny the correctness of the proposed amendment facts, and allowing it would cause no prejudice to them, whereas rejection would result in irreparable loss to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs are directed to carry out the necessary amendment within the stipulated period and submit the amended copy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division Sangli

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division Sangli

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division Sangli

  8. 27-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division Sangli

  9. 24-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division Sangli

  10. 29-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division Sangli

  11. 27-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division Sangli

  12. 19-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division Sangli

  13. 08-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    IInd Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Divison Sangli

  14. 25-Jul-2025

    Dismissal Order

    IInd Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Divison Sangli

  15. 27-Jun-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  16. 27-Jun-2025

    Dismissal Order

    IInd Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Divison Sangli

  17. 07-May-2025

    Evidence

    IInd Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Divison Sangli

  18. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    IInd Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Divison Sangli

  19. 05-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    IInd Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Divison Sangli

  20. 18-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    IInd Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Divison Sangli

  21. 19-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    IInd Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Divison Sangli

  22. 17-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    IInd Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Divison Sangli

  23. 13-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    IInd Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Divison Sangli

  24. 31-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    IInd Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Divison Sangli

  25. 26-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    IInd Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Divison Sangli

  26. 15-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    IInd Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Divison Sangli

  27. 12-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    IInd Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Divison Sangli

  28. 13-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    IInd Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Divison Sangli

  29. 25-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    IInd Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Divison Sangli

  30. 24-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    IInd Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Divison Sangli

  31. 14-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    IInd Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Divison Sangli

  32. 06-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    IInd Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Divison Sangli

  33. 27-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    IInd Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Divison Sangli

  34. 14-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    IInd Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Divison Sangli

  35. 29-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Iiird Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division Sangli

  36. 15-Mar-2022

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  37. 15-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    Iiird Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division Sangli

  38. 14-Mar-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    Iiird Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division Sangli

  39. 05-Mar-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    Ivth Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division Sangli

  40. 25-Feb-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    Ivth Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division Sangli

  41. 03-Feb-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    Ivth Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division Sangli

  42. 27-Jan-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    Ivth Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division Sangli

  43. 07-Jan-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    Ivth Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division Sangli

  44. 13-Dec-2021

    Awaiting Notice

    Ivth Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division Sangli

  45. 03-Dec-2021

    First Order

    Vth Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division Sangli

  46. 29-Nov-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 22-Nov-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 363/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application for amendment of the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been allowed. The court found that the proposed amendment to paragraph 3 of the plaint is explanatory in nature and necessary for effectual decision of the suit, as the plaintiffs obtained crucial information about the government's road widening work during the pendency of the suit. The defendants did not deny the correctness of the proposed amendment facts, and allowing it would cause no prejudice to them, whereas rejection would result in irreparable loss to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs are directed to carry out the necessary amendment within the stipulated period and submit the amended copy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case