Prasad Ashok Chavan vs State of Maharashtra through Collector Advocate - Kulkarni Vinay Madhukar — 363/2021

Summary: The application for amendment of the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been allowed. The court found that the proposed amendment to paragraph 3 of the plaint is explanatory in nature and necessary for effectual decision of the suit, as the plaintiffs obtained crucial information about the government's road widening work during the pendency of the suit. The defendants did not deny the correctness of the proposed amendment facts, and allowing it would cause no prejudice to them, whereas rejection would result in irreparable loss to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs are directed to carry out the necessary amendment within the stipulated period and submit the amended copy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.