Padma Nitin Pore vs Vitthal Ganpati Patange — 90/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21,R 22. Status: Stayed by District Court. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Reg Dkst - Regular Execution Petition
CNR: MHSN020023412019
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2106/2019
Filing Date
29-08-2019
Registration No
90/2019
Registration Date
20-09-2019
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Sangli
Judge
5-Vth JT CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C. SANGLI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Padma Nitin Pore
Adv. Yadav Sudhakar Maruti
Respondent(s)
Vitthal Ganpati Patange
Ananda Vitthal Patange
Madhav Vitthal Patange
Vasanti Vishvajit Malvade
Shraddha Shailendra Godbole
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Vth JT CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C. SANGLI
Stayed by District Court
Stayed by District Court
Stayed by District Court
Stayed by District Court
Stayed by District Court
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Stayed by District Court | |
| 19-01-2026 | Stayed by District Court | |
| 11-12-2025 | Stayed by District Court | |
| 25-11-2025 | Stayed by District Court | |
| 24-09-2025 | Stayed by District Court |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application for appointment of a court commissioner was partly allowed. The court issued a possession warrant under Order 21 Rule 35 CPC directing the bailiff to hand over peaceful and vacant possession of the immovable property (identified as AKNM) to the decree holder and consenting parties as per the commissioner's report in DF case No. 6/2012. The bailiff was instructed to follow due procedure and submit a report, with provision for police assistance if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application for appointment of a court commissioner was partly allowed. The court issued a possession warrant under Order 21 Rule 35 CPC directing the bailiff to hand over peaceful and vacant possession of the immovable property (identified as AKNM) to the decree holder and consenting parties as per the commissioner's report in DF case No. 6/2012. The bailiff was instructed to follow due procedure and submit a report, with provision for police assistance if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts