Vinayak Balkrushna Jadhav vs Subhadra Balkrushna Jadhav — 292/2024
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6,. Status: W.S. and Say. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN020023092024
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
e-Filing Number
20-07-2024
Filing Number
1726/2024
Filing Date
20-07-2024
Registration No
292/2024
Registration Date
20-07-2024
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Sangli
Judge
5-Vth JT CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C. SANGLI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vinayak Balkrushna Jadhav
Adv. Zambare Vinayak Shashikant
Respondent(s)
Subhadra Balkrushna Jadhav
Dinkar Balkrushna Jadhav
Bharati Gopal Patil
Suman Raghunath Patil
Kamal Nivrutti Patil
Ramchandra Narayan Jadhav
Hari Ganpati Jadhav(Legal Heir) 7.
Shalan Hari Jadhav 7.
Laxman Hari Jadhav 7.
Sunanda Sambhaji Patil 7.
Dhanashri Dhananjay Patil 7.5.
Sandesh Sayaji Patil 7.5.
Sanketa Amar Patil
Sandeep Pandurang Patil
Jaydeep Pandurang Patil
Ramniwas Bhagirath Sarada
Govind Bhagirath Sarada
Subhash Shrirang Jadhav
Sujata Subhash Jadhav
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Vth JT CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C. SANGLI
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | W.S. and Say | |
| 06-02-2026 | W.S. and Say | |
| 06-01-2026 | W.S. and Say | |
| 28-11-2025 | W.S. and Say | |
| 11-11-2025 | W.S. and Say |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed defendants Nos.1 and 2's application for condonation of delay in filing their Written Statement (3 days late). The court accepted their Written Statement on record in the interest of justice and fairness of trial, despite finding insufficient diligence on the defendants' part. However, the defendants were ordered to pay costs of Rs.200/- to the plaintiff as a condition precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed defendants Nos.1 and 2's application for condonation of delay in filing their Written Statement (3 days late). The court accepted their Written Statement on record in the interest of justice and fairness of trial, despite finding insufficient diligence on the defendants' part. However, the defendants were ordered to pay costs of Rs.200/- to the plaintiff as a condition precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts