Vinayak Balkrushna Jadhav vs Subhadra Balkrushna Jadhav — 292/2024

Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Status: W.S. and Say. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

W.S. and Say Next hearing 07-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN020023092024

e-Filing Number

20-07-2024

Filing Number

1726/2024

Filing Date

20-Jul-2024

Registration No

292/2024

Registration Date

20-Jul-2024

Court

Civil Court Senior Division ,Sangli

Judge

5-Vth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Succession Act Section 6

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

1.Vinayak Balkrushna Jadhav

Adv. Zambare Vinayak Shashikant

Respondent(s)

1.Subhadra Balkrushna Jadhav
2.Dinkar Balkrushna Jadhav
3.Bharati Gopal Patil
4.Suman Raghunath Patil
5.Kamal Nivrutti Patil
6.Ramchandra Narayan Jadhav
7.Hari Ganpati Jadhav(Legal Heir) 7.
8.Shalan Hari Jadhav 7.
9.Laxman Hari Jadhav 7.
10.Sunanda Sambhaji Patil 7.
11.Dhanashri Dhananjay Patil 7.5.
12.Sandesh Sayaji Patil 7.5.
13.Sanketa Amar Patil
14.Sandeep Pandurang Patil
15.Jaydeep Pandurang Patil
16.Ramniwas Bhagirath Sarada
17.Govind Bhagirath Sarada
18.Subhash Shrirang Jadhav
19.Sujata Subhash Jadhav

Case History

07-Apr-2026

Next hearingPending
07-Mar-2026

W.S. and Say

Vth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
06-Feb-2026

W.S. and Say

Vth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
06-Jan-2026

W.S. and Say

Vth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
28-Nov-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Summary: The court allowed defendants Nos.1 and 2's application for condonation of delay in filing their Written Statement (3 days late). The court accepted their Written Statement on record in the interest of justice and fairness of trial, despite finding insufficient diligence on the defendants' part. However, the defendants were ordered to pay costs of Rs.200/- to the plaintiff as a condition precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
28-Nov-2025

W.S. and Say

Vth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
11-Nov-2025

W.S. and Say

Vth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
30-Oct-2025

W.S. and Say

Vth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
04-Oct-2025

W.S. and Say

Vth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
22-Aug-2025

W.S. and Say

Vth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
18-Jul-2025

W.S. and Say

Vth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
20-Jun-2025

W.S. and Say

Vth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
28-Apr-2025

W.S. and Say

IVth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
27-Mar-2025

W.S. and Say

VIth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Sangli
06-Mar-2025

W.S. and Say

VIth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Sangli
10-Feb-2025

W.S. and Say

VIth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Sangli
21-Jan-2025

W.S. and Say

VIth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Sangli
15-Jan-2025

W.S. and Say

VIth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Sangli
02-Jan-2025

W.S. and Say

VIth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Sangli
09-Dec-2024

W.S. and Say

VIth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Sangli
21-Nov-2024

W.S. and Say

VIth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Sangli
21-Oct-2024

Appearance

VIth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Sangli
18-Sep-2024

Argument on Exh.____Unready

VIth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Sangli
19-Aug-2024

Argument on Exh.____Unready

VIth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Sangli
03-Aug-2024

Order on ExhibitView PDF
03-Aug-2024

Argument on Exh.____Unready

VIth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Sangli
02-Aug-2024

Argument on Exh.____Unready

VIth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Sangli
29-Jul-2024

Argument on Exh.____Unready

VIth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Sangli
25-Jul-2024

First Order

VIth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Sangli
24-Jul-2024

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
20-Jul-2024

Case filed

Registration No. 292/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed defendants Nos.1 and 2's application for condonation of delay in filing their Written Statement (3 days late). The court accepted their Written Statement on record in the interest of justice and fairness of trial, despite finding insufficient diligence on the defendants' part. However, the defendants were ordered to pay costs of Rs.200/- to the plaintiff as a condition precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.