Bharati Ramchandra Mali vs Ramchandra Pandurang Mali Advocate - Kulkarni Ajinkya Chandrashekhar — 200006/2011
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ord21rule11. Status: Report. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
Spl .Dkst - Execution Petition against decree passed in Special Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN020018172010
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
202073/2010
Filing Date
22-12-2010
Registration No
200006/2011
Registration Date
24-01-2011
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Sangli
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION SANGLI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bharati Ramchandra Mali
Adv. Sarnobat Pradip
Hemant Ramchandra Mali
Respondent(s)
Ramchandra Pandurang Mali Advocate - Kulkarni Ajinkya Chandrashekhar
Pandurang Mali(Legal Heir)
Pramila Pandurang Mali
Sudhir Pandurang Mali
Sangita Arvind Mali
Rajendra Mahadeo Mali
Balasaheb Sahadeo Mali
Surekha Rajendra Mali
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION SANGLI
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Report | |
| 06-02-2026 | Report | |
| 03-01-2026 | Report | |
| 15-11-2025 | Report | |
| 31-10-2025 | Report |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Special Darkhast No.6/2011 | Sou. Bharati Mali vs. Ramchandra Mali The court allowed the review application and set aside its previous order dated 24/06/2021 that had prohibited the sale of J.D.No.1's property share for maintenance recovery (Rs. 8,52,625). The court directed that the Revenue authority ascertain and fix the exact extent of J.D.No.1's share in the suit properties, and the applicant must provide necessary revenue documents for this determination. Once the share is ascertained, it can be attached and sold for recovery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Special Darkhast No.6/2011 | Sou. Bharati Mali vs. Ramchandra Mali The court allowed the review application and set aside its previous order dated 24/06/2021 that had prohibited the sale of J.D.No.1's property share for maintenance recovery (Rs. 8,52,625). The court directed that the Revenue authority ascertain and fix the exact extent of J.D.No.1's share in the suit properties, and the applicant must provide necessary revenue documents for this determination. Once the share is ascertained, it can be attached and sold for recovery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts