Malti Abasaheb Patil Deceased vs Sanjay @ Sanjeev Abasaheb Patil etc.3 Advocate - Deshpande Vinayak Madhukar — 200008/2011
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
Final Decree
CNR: MHSN020014372011
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
201608/2011
Filing Date
11-10-2011
Registration No
200008/2011
Registration Date
31-10-2011
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Sangli
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION SANGLI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Malti Abasaheb Patil Deceased
Adv. Kadam Vaibhav Vijayrao
Chitrarekha Ravindra Shinde
Ruta Abhay Patil
Respondent(s)
Sanjay @ Sanjeev Abasaheb Patil etc.3 Advocate - Deshpande Vinayak Madhukar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION SANGLI
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 25-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 02-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 12-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 08-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed by the non-petitioner (respondent) was allowed with conditions. The non-petitioner requested permission to file arguments, claiming health issues (angioplasty) preventing court attendance. Although the petitioner opposed the plea claiming deliberate delay tactics, the court permitted the non-petitioner to file arguments while imposing costs of ₹5,000 each on the petitioner and ₹5,000 to the District Authority as a penalty for the case delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed by the non-petitioner (respondent) was allowed with conditions. The non-petitioner requested permission to file arguments, claiming health issues (angioplasty) preventing court attendance. Although the petitioner opposed the plea claiming deliberate delay tactics, the court permitted the non-petitioner to file arguments while imposing costs of ₹5,000 each on the petitioner and ₹5,000 to the District Authority as a penalty for the case delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts