Shri. Shanaishwar Nagari Sahkari Patsanstha Maryadit Sangli vs Satish Liladhar Bhate — 19/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21,R11. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
Spl .Dkst - Execution Petition against decree passed in Special Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN020011482025
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
16-06-2025
Filing Number
1207/2025
Filing Date
17-06-2025
Registration No
19/2025
Registration Date
17-06-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Sangli
Judge
2-JT CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION SANGLI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri. Shanaishwar Nagari Sahkari Patsanstha Maryadit Sangli
Adv. Patil Satish Tukaram
Respondent(s)
Satish Liladhar Bhate
Shamaji Moraraji Gala
Rajesh Shamaji Gala
Adv. Upadhye Sanjay Manohar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JT CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION SANGLI
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 02-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 23-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 11-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 03-10-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application for public notice against Defendant No. 1 (J.D. No.1) has been allowed. The court directed substituted service of notice through publication in the widely circulated daily newspaper "Tarun Bharat" under Order V Rule-20 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as the defendant's address was unavailable and earlier notice attempts were unsuccessful. The applicant (D.H.) is required to deposit the publication charges directly with the newspaper office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application for public notice against Defendant No. 1 (J.D. No.1) has been allowed. The court directed substituted service of notice through publication in the widely circulated daily newspaper "Tarun Bharat" under Order V Rule-20 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as the defendant's address was unavailable and earlier notice attempts were unsuccessful. The applicant (D.H.) is required to deposit the publication charges directly with the newspaper office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts