Kundalik Mahadev Khot vs Prakash Virpanna Chambhar Alias Kamble Advocate - Bangar Shrinivas Subhash — 177/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 10,38,. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHSN020011382025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

20th April 2026

e-Filing Number

14-06-2025

Filing Number

1197/2025

Filing Date

16-06-2025

Registration No

177/2025

Registration Date

16-06-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division ,Sangli

Judge

2-JT CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION SANGLI

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 10,38,

Petitioner(s)

Kundalik Mahadev Khot

Adv. Gavade Sudhir Rajaram

Respondent(s)

Prakash Virpanna Chambhar Alias Kamble Advocate - Bangar Shrinivas Subhash

Janabai Virpanna Kamble Alias Chambhar

Anita Rajesh Tomake

Rekha Rajendra Mane

Hearing History

Judge: 2-JT CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION SANGLI

18-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

11-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

09-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

07-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

25-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court allowed the application (petition No. 30) filed by the petitioner seeking condonation of delay in filing an affidavit/statement by Respondent No. 1, who was undergoing medical treatment for gangrene and mobility issues. The court found the reasons for delay justified and permitted the respondent to file the required affidavit/statement, noting that denying this would prejudice the respondent's right to present their case and that both parties should have an opportunity to raise their arguments in a single proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the application (petition No. 30) filed by the petitioner seeking condonation of delay in filing an affidavit/statement by Respondent No. 1, who was undergoing medical treatment for gangrene and mobility issues. The court found the reasons for delay justified and permitted the respondent to file the required affidavit/statement, noting that denying this would prejudice the respondent's right to present their case and that both parties should have an opportunity to raise their arguments in a single proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division ,Sangli All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case