Dhanyakumar Balaso Kothale vs Balaso Alias Balasaheb Shripal Kothale Advocate - Shete Abhinandan Ulhas — 136/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22,34,38,. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHSN020008722025
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
e-Filing Number
17-04-2025
Filing Number
917/2025
Filing Date
19-04-2025
Registration No
136/2025
Registration Date
19-04-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Sangli
Judge
2-JT CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION SANGLI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dhanyakumar Balaso Kothale
Adv. Dange Sameer Bashir
Sunita Balaso Kothale
Adv. Dange Sameer Bashir
Respondent(s)
Balaso Alias Balasaheb Shripal Kothale Advocate - Shete Abhinandan Ulhas
Vardhaman Balaso Kothale
The Ashta Peoples Co-Op Bank Ltd. Ashta
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JT CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION SANGLI
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Steps
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 18-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 30-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 05-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 10-12-2025 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application to delete defendant No. 3 (a co-operative society) from the partition suit is allowed. The plaintiffs failed to issue the mandatory pre-suit notice under Section 164 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act before naming the society as defendant. The court directed the plaintiffs to amend the plaint within 14 days and proceed with the suit against defendants 1 and 2 (co-parceners/joint family members), holding that the suit is tenable against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application to delete defendant No. 3 (a co-operative society) from the partition suit is allowed. The plaintiffs failed to issue the mandatory pre-suit notice under Section 164 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act before naming the society as defendant. The court directed the plaintiffs to amend the plaint within 14 days and proceed with the suit against defendants 1 and 2 (co-parceners/joint family members), holding that the suit is tenable against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts