Dhanyakumar Balaso Kothale vs Balaso Alias Balasaheb Shripal Kothale Advocate - Shete Abhinandan Ulhas — 136/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22,34,38,. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHSN020008722025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

06th April 2026

e-Filing Number

17-04-2025

Filing Number

917/2025

Filing Date

19-04-2025

Registration No

136/2025

Registration Date

19-04-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division ,Sangli

Judge

2-JT CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION SANGLI

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22,34,38,

Petitioner(s)

Dhanyakumar Balaso Kothale

Adv. Dange Sameer Bashir

Sunita Balaso Kothale

Adv. Dange Sameer Bashir

Respondent(s)

Balaso Alias Balasaheb Shripal Kothale Advocate - Shete Abhinandan Ulhas

Vardhaman Balaso Kothale

The Ashta Peoples Co-Op Bank Ltd. Ashta

Hearing History

Judge: 2-JT CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION SANGLI

07-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

18-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

30-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

05-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

10-12-2025

Steps

Interim Orders

31-10-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The application to delete defendant No. 3 (a co-operative society) from the partition suit is allowed. The plaintiffs failed to issue the mandatory pre-suit notice under Section 164 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act before naming the society as defendant. The court directed the plaintiffs to amend the plaint within 14 days and proceed with the suit against defendants 1 and 2 (co-parceners/joint family members), holding that the suit is tenable against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application to delete defendant No. 3 (a co-operative society) from the partition suit is allowed. The plaintiffs failed to issue the mandatory pre-suit notice under Section 164 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act before naming the society as defendant. The court directed the plaintiffs to amend the plaint within 14 days and proceed with the suit against defendants 1 and 2 (co-parceners/joint family members), holding that the suit is tenable against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division ,Sangli All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case