Raghunath Santram Satpute vs Sangli Miraj Kupwad Muncipal Corporation Commissioner Advocate - Kadam Sujata Prakash — 67/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: W.S. and Say. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

W.S. and Say Next hearing 08-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN020003742026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

404/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

67/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Senior Division ,Sangli

Judge

3-Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Sangli

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Raghunath Santram Satpute

    Adv. Mursal Aarbaz Abdulsattar

  2. 2.Suhas Shashikant Dixit

    Adv. Mursal Aarbaz Abdulsattar

  3. 3.Nasirhusain Mahammad Husain Mujawar

    Adv. Mursal Aarbaz Abdulsattar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sangli Miraj Kupwad Muncipal Corporation Commissioner Advocate - Kadam Sujata Prakash

Case History

  1. 08-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Sangli

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Sangli

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' prayer for ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the Municipal Corporation's demolition notice for unauthorized construction. The court found that while the plaintiffs produced sale deeds and tax receipts, they failed to demonstrate prior permission from competent authorities for the construction. A show cause notice was issued to the defendant, and summons were issued requiring the defendant to file a written statement within 30 days, with the case proceeding to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Sangli

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 67/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' prayer for ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the Municipal Corporation's demolition notice for unauthorized construction. The court found that while the plaintiffs produced sale deeds and tax receipts, they failed to demonstrate prior permission from competent authorities for the construction. A show cause notice was issued to the defendant, and summons were issued requiring the defendant to file a written statement within 30 days, with the case proceeding to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case