Raghunath Santram Satpute vs Sangli Miraj Kupwad Muncipal Corporation Commissioner Advocate - Kadam Sujata Prakash — 67/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,. Status: W.S. and Say. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN020003742026

W.S. and Say

Next Hearing

08th April 2026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

404/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

67/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

Civil Court Senior Division ,Sangli

Judge

3-JT CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. SANGLI

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,

Petitioner(s)

Raghunath Santram Satpute

Adv. Mursal Aarbaz Abdulsattar

Suhas Shashikant Dixit

Adv. Mursal Aarbaz Abdulsattar

Nasirhusain Mahammad Husain Mujawar

Adv. Mursal Aarbaz Abdulsattar

Respondent(s)

Sangli Miraj Kupwad Muncipal Corporation Commissioner Advocate - Kadam Sujata Prakash

Hearing History

Judge: 3-JT CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. SANGLI

30-03-2026

W.S. and Say

17-03-2026

W.S. and Say

09-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

07-03-2026

First Order

Interim Orders

09-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' prayer for ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the Municipal Corporation's demolition notice for unauthorized construction. The court found that while the plaintiffs produced sale deeds and tax receipts, they failed to demonstrate prior permission from competent authorities for the construction. A show cause notice was issued to the defendant, and summons were issued requiring the defendant to file a written statement within 30 days, with the case proceeding to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' prayer for ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the Municipal Corporation's demolition notice for unauthorized construction. The court found that while the plaintiffs produced sale deeds and tax receipts, they failed to demonstrate prior permission from competent authorities for the construction. A show cause notice was issued to the defendant, and summons were issued requiring the defendant to file a written statement within 30 days, with the case proceeding to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division ,Sangli All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case