Adinath Laxman Ganeshwade vs Sangli Miraj Kupwad Muncipal Corporation Commissioner Advocate - Kadam Sujata Prakash — 66/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: W.S. and Say. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN020003732026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
403/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
66/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Sangli
Judge
3-Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Sangli
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Adinath Laxman Ganeshwade
Adv. Mursal Aarbaz Abdulsattar
-
2.Suresh Balaso Kamble
Adv. Mursal Aarbaz Abdulsattar
-
3.Rakesh Adinath Ganeshwade
Adv. Mursal Aarbaz Abdulsattar
-
4.Sandip Shashikant Sutar
Adv. Mursal Aarbaz Abdulsattar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sangli Miraj Kupwad Muncipal Corporation Commissioner Advocate - Kadam Sujata Prakash
Case History
-
08-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Mar-2026
W.S. and Say
Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Sangli
-
17-Mar-2026
W.S. and Say
Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Sangli
-
09-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' prayer for an ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the Municipal Corporation's demolition notice dated 16.02.2026, finding that no evidence showed the construction had prior municipal permission. The court noted the defendant must be heard before granting relief and issued a show cause notice to the defendant regarding confirmation of the injunction. Summons were also issued to the defendant to file a written statement within 30 days and the case was posted for settlement of issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. Sangli
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 66/2026
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' prayer for an ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the Municipal Corporation's demolition notice dated 16.02.2026, finding that no evidence showed the construction had prior municipal permission. The court noted the defendant must be heard before granting relief and issued a show cause notice to the defendant regarding confirmation of the injunction. Summons were also issued to the defendant to file a written statement within 30 days and the case was posted for settlement of issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts